Still, Life Goes on : A Qualitative Study on Experience and Resilience Process of the Surviving Families who Lost Other Family Members by Traffic Accidents

??? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ??? ?????????. ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? 8?????? ???????????? ???????????????, ????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????????. ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????, ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????????, ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????????, ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????????. Hill, Thomson, Williams(1997)??? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????(CQR)??? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????????. ???????????? ??????, ??? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????, ??????????????? ????????????, ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? 3?????? ????????? ?????? 11?????? ??????, 16??? ????????????, 52??? ?????????????????? ???????????????. ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ??????. ????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? (a) ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? (b) ?????????, ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? (c) ?????? ??????, ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? (d) ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? 4?????? ????????? ???????????????. ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????, ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????????????, ?????????, ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????????, ??????????????? ?????????, ?????????, ????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ?????????. ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ?????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????, ????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ??? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????????, ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????????. ?????????????????? ???????????????????????? (a) ???????????? ?????? (b) ???????????? ?????? (c) ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? (d) ???????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? (e) ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ??? 5?????? ????????? ???????????????. ??????????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????????. ?????? ???????????? ??????????????? ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????. ?????????, ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????????, ????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????????, ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????????. ????????? ????????? ?????????????????? (a) ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? (b) ????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? 2?????? ????????? ???????????????. ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????????. ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ??????????????????, ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ??? ????????? ???????????????. ??? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????????, ????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ????????? ??? ??? ??????. ??? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ??? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????????, ?????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????????, ???????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??????. ???????????? ????????????, ?????????, ??????, ????????????, ????????? ?????? ??????(CQR)This study examines the experience and resilience process of family members who lost their families in a traffic accident. The data were collected during one-on-one in-depth interviews with eight families assessed to have recovered after loss. Interview questions included the following: ???how the families experienced the accident afterwards,??? ???how they overcame the pain of loss,??? ???how they got back to their lives,??? and ???how the experience of loss affected their lives over time.??? Following Hill, Thomson, and Williams (1997), the interview recording data were analyzed using CQR. Based on the data analysis, the responses from the participants in this study were divided into three domains, including experience after the accident, loss resilience process, and posttraumatic growth, 11 categories and 16 subcategories, and 52 core concepts were identified. The main results of the study are summarized as follows. There were four subcategories in the theme of ???experience after the accident:??? (a) emotional confusion immediately after the accident(b) emotional and behavioral difficulties(c) complex irregularities resulting from legal and administrative proceduresand (d) changes in roles and conflicts in the family. Immediately after the accident, family members suffered emotional distress, such as shock, anger, and resentment, and had negative experiences, such as feelings of depression and loss, disruption of interpersonal relationships, and physical and mental difficulties. Family members also underwent another type of emotional distress during the complicated legal and administrative post-processing, and faced rapid changes in family relations due to changes in roles and conflicts in the family. The ???loss resilience process??? theme included the following: (a) religious devotion(b) dependence on drugs(c) healing and resilience through human relationships and social activities(d) spiritual communication with the deceasedand (e) resilience efforts for self-comfort and healing through environmental change. Bereaved families sought to relieve their suffering by relying on drugs or God after the accident. They also showed a willingness to overcome the pain of loss through positive relationships or participation in social activities, such as volunteering. Moreover, they sought comfort through attempts at spiritual communication and sympathy with the deceased, self-healing efforts, such as exercise, and tried to go on with their lives by changing their environment. The theme of ?????????growth after resilience??? consisted of two categories: (a) reconstruction of the meaning and value of life, and (b) acceptance of loss. Throughout the process of loss and mourning, bereaved families changed their values ??????and views about life and death. They also sought to establish a spiritual relationship with the deceased, acknowledge and accept the loss, and gradually readjust to life. This study corroborates and expands the findings of previous research by highlighting the experience and resilience process of traffic accident families and confirms the elements of psychological support to promote healing and restoration and help families readjust to life. Considering the limitations of this study, future studies should confirm the common experiences of families of traffic accident victims across a large sample and compare the thematic structure among the groups identified in terms of the period after death and the relationship with the deceased. In addition, it may be necessary to identify complex and dynamic relationships between themes through alternative research. Keywords: traffic accidents, bereaved families, loss, resilience process, Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR)Docto