Epistemological beliefs and practice in a preschool setting

Thesis (M.Ed.)--University of Melbourne, Dept. of Education, 2004The aim of this case study was to determine whether the level of espoused epistemological beliefs of a qualified teacher and unqualified assistant were implicit in each Teacher's individual practice. The study was undertaken in a privately operated preschool in Victoria. Two participants were chosen on their identified preference to work and be recognized by co-workers, parents and children, as a team of two teachers working side by side. For this reason, the participants were referred to as Teacher A and Teacher B. Data were collected using five different methods of inquiry: preliminary interview; audio transcripts during planning and preparation sessions; copy of the written teaching plan; video recordings of Teacher interactions; and video stimulated debriefings. These methods set out to investigate: the epistemological beliefs of each Teacher; what beliefs held by each Teacher about knowledge, learning, child development and teaching practices were similar or dissimilar; the levels of epistemological development in each Teacher's espoused beliefs; the consistency between each Teacher's espoused beliefs with their individual practice; and whether each Teacher's level of epistemological development was implicit in their individual practice. The research indicates that Teacher A and Teacher B generally held varying beliefs about the nature of knowledge, learning, child development, and teaching practice. Despite dissimilarities, the comparison of each Teacher's espoused beliefs with Belenky et al's (1986) Women's Ways of Knowing Model revealed each had the same level of espoused epistemological development, which was subjective knowledge. Comparisons between Teacher A and Teacher B's espoused beliefs with individual practice revealed that each Teacher's beliefs were predominantly inconsistent with their practice. The results also revealed inconsistencies between practice and particular recollections by each Teacher. Although the comparative analyses of each Teacher's beliefs and practice revealed inconsistencies, the comparative analyses of each Teacher's espoused epistemological development with each Teacher's practice revealed Teacher A and Teacher B's espoused epistemological development were implicit in their individual practice