Measuring university internationalisation: an indicator framework

© 2015 Dr. Yuan GaoThis study investigated university internationalisation in different national contexts and developed a set of indicators to measure and compare university internationalisation performance across national boundaries. Internationalisation has been recognised by university policymakers as the key to perform successfully within the new global context. As internationalising a university requires a substantial and long-term investment of an institution’s financial and human resources, assessment and quality control are critical to ensure that it contributes to the relevance and quality of higher education and produces desirable outcomes. The importance of, motives for, and process of university internationalisation have been discussed and documented well in existing research, however, a limited number of studies have focused on measuring university internationalisation. It is not even clear what should and what can be measured with regard to university internationalisation. Through a combination of a critical literature review and qualitative interviews with policymakers from universities in Australia, Singapore, and China, this study established a conceptual framework of university internationalisation. Based on the framework, with the help of university practitioners, a set of internationally applicable indicators was developed to assist universities to systematically monitor and measure their internationalisation performance, and make comparisons with like institutions. The availability of data for the indicator set in different universities was also tested through an institutional survey. This study found that internationalisation is seen as a multi-dimensional phenomenon. The major incentive for institutional internationalisation is the pursuit for academic excellence. Seven key comparable dimensions were identified in university internationalisation strategies: research, student, faculty, curriculum, engagement, governance, and culture. Universities tend to place different priorities on these dimensions. National and institutional characteristics powerfully shape the understanding and practice of internationalisation. The indicator set established in this study provides a possible way for universities to measure their internationalisation performance and benchmark with others. Although the indicators are perceived as feasible, the data are not yet ready to report in most universities. This study contributes to a better understanding of university internationalisation and sheds light on the measurement of the phenomenon. The study suggests that universities may embrace internationalisation in various approaches; however, a holistic approach is highly likely to evolve at a mature stage. The theoretical framework and the indicator set developed in this study are expected to stimulate a more regular data collection mechanism. Policymakers are able to make evidence-based decisions with data generated by the indicator set. In measuring university internationalisation, this study suggests that available measurement instruments are more capable of assessing inputs and outputs rather outcomes