Legislating our right to die

© 1997 Dr. Fiona Catherine HumThis thesis argues that the enactment by the Northern Territory Legislative Assembly in 1995 of the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT), (‘the Act’) did not advance, but rather diminished, a patient’s right to request and receive assistance to die at the time it was in operation. The author suggests the Act failed to achieve the goal of balancing competing interests (patient autonomy versus procedural safeguards) and instead created unnecessarily complex legal and institutional obstacles for terminally ill patients. Despite the positively stated intentions of the main proponent of the legislation, Mr Perron, the parliamentary drafters of the Act erred on the side of caution. Consequently, it was difficult, if not at times impossible, for persons to use the Act in a way which led to results consistent with the Act’s intended purpose. The complex procedural regime set up by the Act, indicates a regressive shift from a patient’s right to undertake an autonomous decision-making process towards a decision process governed by medical paternalism and State intervention. The central argument presented in this thesis is that the rights of patients to take control of their own body and the manner of their own death, will be eroded rather than enhanced if the legislation in the form discussed becomes enacted. Possible alternatives to legislating on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are suggested by the author