No specific funding was received for this study. MB receives salary support from the Health Research Council of New Zealand. The Health Services Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates. These funders had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.Peer reviewedPublisher PD
This article analyses 131 articles that have been retracted from peer-reviewed journals in business ...
In June 2015, invitations were sent by email to 151 APAME journals to participate in an online surve...
Guowei Li,1–3 Mariam Kamel,1 Yanling Jin,1 Michael Kuan Xu,1 Lawrence Mbuagbaw,1,2 Zainab Sama...
Abstract Objective We investigated whether responses about possible scientific misconduct from journ...
Funding The study received no specific funding. MB is the recipient of an HRC Clinical Practitioner ...
The Health Services Research Unit at the University of Aberdeen is funded by the Chief Scientist Off...
A formal complaint was lodged with the British Psychological Society in 1995 that alleged serious sc...
Abstract Better understanding of research and publishing misconduct can improve strategies to mitiga...
Objective: The journal received a request to retract a paper reporting the results of a triple-blind...
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify how many publications retracted beca...
Cancer research is occasionally described as being in a reproducibility crisis. The cancer literatur...
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify how many publications retracted beca...
Acknowledgements: We thank Mari Imamura for help with translating documents written in Japanese. Fun...
This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings ...
This evidence-based opinion piece gives a short overview of the increase in retractions of publicati...
This article analyses 131 articles that have been retracted from peer-reviewed journals in business ...
In June 2015, invitations were sent by email to 151 APAME journals to participate in an online surve...
Guowei Li,1–3 Mariam Kamel,1 Yanling Jin,1 Michael Kuan Xu,1 Lawrence Mbuagbaw,1,2 Zainab Sama...
Abstract Objective We investigated whether responses about possible scientific misconduct from journ...
Funding The study received no specific funding. MB is the recipient of an HRC Clinical Practitioner ...
The Health Services Research Unit at the University of Aberdeen is funded by the Chief Scientist Off...
A formal complaint was lodged with the British Psychological Society in 1995 that alleged serious sc...
Abstract Better understanding of research and publishing misconduct can improve strategies to mitiga...
Objective: The journal received a request to retract a paper reporting the results of a triple-blind...
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify how many publications retracted beca...
Cancer research is occasionally described as being in a reproducibility crisis. The cancer literatur...
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify how many publications retracted beca...
Acknowledgements: We thank Mari Imamura for help with translating documents written in Japanese. Fun...
This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings ...
This evidence-based opinion piece gives a short overview of the increase in retractions of publicati...
This article analyses 131 articles that have been retracted from peer-reviewed journals in business ...
In June 2015, invitations were sent by email to 151 APAME journals to participate in an online surve...
Guowei Li,1–3 Mariam Kamel,1 Yanling Jin,1 Michael Kuan Xu,1 Lawrence Mbuagbaw,1,2 Zainab Sama...