From Wide Cognition to Mechanisms: A Silent Revolution

This is the final version. Available from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record. In this paper, we argue that several recent ‘wide’ perspectives on cognition (embodied, embedded, extended, enactive, and distributed) are only partially relevant to the study of cognition. While these wide accounts override traditional methodological individualism, the study of cognition has already progressed beyond these proposed perspectives toward building integrated explanations of the mechanisms involved, including not only internal submechanisms but also interactions with others, groups, cognitive artifacts, and their environment. Wide perspectives are essentially research heuristics for building mechanistic explanations. The claim is substantiated with reference to recent developments in the study of “mindreading” and debates on emotions. We argue that the current practice in cognitive (neuro)science has undergone, in effect, a silent mechanistic revolution, and has turned from initial binary oppositions and abstract proposals toward the integration of wide perspectives with the rest of the cognitive (neuro)sciences.European Network for Social Intelligence, SINTELNETNational Science Centre, PolandPortuguese FCTResearch Foundation Flanders (FWO)Mary Immaculate College, LimerickUniversity of ExeterKozminski University, WarsawNicolaus Copernicus University, Toru