The journey from evidence to policy is inevitably complex and frequently becomes divisive as arguments rage about the validity and worth of the evidence presented. This is especially true in the "post-truth" era, where the opinions of experts are viewed with scepticism, opposing views (and evidence) are dismissed as "fake news", and social media algorithms have fostered an "echo chamber" effect which further entrenches opinions. To effectively navigate this complexity, Peter Horton and Garrett Wallace Brown propose a new methodology for policy development, one which fully integrates scientific investigation with political debate and social discourse
Trust is often invoked as a key ingredient to establishing effective relationships between researche...
In recent years, western democracies have experienced a damaging erosion of faith in scientific expe...
With policy recommendations subject to ever greater scrutiny – not only of their viability but also ...
Effective communication of research is often cited as being most important to gaining the attention ...
Superficially connecting evidence to policy might seem like singular process that brings together di...
There is an accepted need to bridge the gap between academic research and public policy. Knowledge b...
Our social media feeds are full of articles shared by friends and family that make claims about how ...
The main aim of this thesis is to advocate a more scientifically informed approach towards epidemiol...
There is no doubt that good communications and framing research and evidence for your audience is im...
According to constitutivists about epistemic normativity, epistemic normativity is explained by the ...
This paper outlines a new type of skepticism that is both compatible with fallibilism and supported ...
The call for evidence-based policy is often accompanied by rather uncritical references to the succe...
This article reports on the analysis of an online forum on the UK’s National Health Service website ...
Whilst much of the focus on policy impact and knowledge exchange is on what researchers need to do, ...
We examine the role of trustworthiness and trust in statistical inference, arguing that it is the ex...
Trust is often invoked as a key ingredient to establishing effective relationships between researche...
In recent years, western democracies have experienced a damaging erosion of faith in scientific expe...
With policy recommendations subject to ever greater scrutiny – not only of their viability but also ...
Effective communication of research is often cited as being most important to gaining the attention ...
Superficially connecting evidence to policy might seem like singular process that brings together di...
There is an accepted need to bridge the gap between academic research and public policy. Knowledge b...
Our social media feeds are full of articles shared by friends and family that make claims about how ...
The main aim of this thesis is to advocate a more scientifically informed approach towards epidemiol...
There is no doubt that good communications and framing research and evidence for your audience is im...
According to constitutivists about epistemic normativity, epistemic normativity is explained by the ...
This paper outlines a new type of skepticism that is both compatible with fallibilism and supported ...
The call for evidence-based policy is often accompanied by rather uncritical references to the succe...
This article reports on the analysis of an online forum on the UK’s National Health Service website ...
Whilst much of the focus on policy impact and knowledge exchange is on what researchers need to do, ...
We examine the role of trustworthiness and trust in statistical inference, arguing that it is the ex...
Trust is often invoked as a key ingredient to establishing effective relationships between researche...
In recent years, western democracies have experienced a damaging erosion of faith in scientific expe...
With policy recommendations subject to ever greater scrutiny – not only of their viability but also ...