Epicurus argued that the good life is the pleasurable life. He also argued that “death is nothing to us”. These claims appear in tension. For, if pleasure is good, then it seems that death is bad when it deprives us of deeply enjoyable time alive. Here, I offer an Epicurean view of pleasure and the complete life which dissolves this tension. This view is, I contend, more appealing than critics of Epicureanism have allowed, in part because it assigns higher value to pleasures that we produce by exercising our rational capacities and by establishing control over our lives
In this paper, I argue that for Epicurus, the highest form and final end of human happiness arises w...
The school of Epicureanism promotes a philosophy based on hedonism, arguing that pleasantness consti...
In this paper, I present a parallel between Schopenhauer, who argues that a purely rational being wo...
Epicurus argued that the good life is the pleasurable life. He also argued that “death is nothing to...
Epicurus posited that the best life involves the greatest pleasures. He also held that it involves a...
I concentrate on Epicurus\u27 attempt to show that pleasure is complete, not just one aim we have fo...
Epicurus argued that death can be neither good nor bad because it involves neither pleasur...
Epicurus argued that death can be neither good nor bad because it involves neither pleasure nor pain...
This essay will defend Epicurus’ (341 – 270 BCE) view that death is not a harm to us
Epicureanism has long been perceived as a theory of hedonism imbodying many contradictions and unint...
This thesis is concerned with the question of what wellbeing consists in, and how well Epicureanism ...
In this dissertation, I argue that there is a standard reading of Epicurus’ ethics (SRE). The thesis...
The Acceptance of the Epicurean Thesis on Pleasure as the Absence of Pain In th...
Epicurus was a philosopher who lived in Greece in the 3rd century B.C. Like his contemporaries, he w...
Epicurus argued that death is not bad for the one who dies, because death is annihilation of the exp...
In this paper, I argue that for Epicurus, the highest form and final end of human happiness arises w...
The school of Epicureanism promotes a philosophy based on hedonism, arguing that pleasantness consti...
In this paper, I present a parallel between Schopenhauer, who argues that a purely rational being wo...
Epicurus argued that the good life is the pleasurable life. He also argued that “death is nothing to...
Epicurus posited that the best life involves the greatest pleasures. He also held that it involves a...
I concentrate on Epicurus\u27 attempt to show that pleasure is complete, not just one aim we have fo...
Epicurus argued that death can be neither good nor bad because it involves neither pleasur...
Epicurus argued that death can be neither good nor bad because it involves neither pleasure nor pain...
This essay will defend Epicurus’ (341 – 270 BCE) view that death is not a harm to us
Epicureanism has long been perceived as a theory of hedonism imbodying many contradictions and unint...
This thesis is concerned with the question of what wellbeing consists in, and how well Epicureanism ...
In this dissertation, I argue that there is a standard reading of Epicurus’ ethics (SRE). The thesis...
The Acceptance of the Epicurean Thesis on Pleasure as the Absence of Pain In th...
Epicurus was a philosopher who lived in Greece in the 3rd century B.C. Like his contemporaries, he w...
Epicurus argued that death is not bad for the one who dies, because death is annihilation of the exp...
In this paper, I argue that for Epicurus, the highest form and final end of human happiness arises w...
The school of Epicureanism promotes a philosophy based on hedonism, arguing that pleasantness consti...
In this paper, I present a parallel between Schopenhauer, who argues that a purely rational being wo...