A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components

This study was supported by a grant from Zimmer Ltd.Modifications in the design of knee replacements have been proposed in order to maximise flexion. We performed a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome, including maximum knee flexion, in patients receiving either a standard or a high flexion version of the NexGen legacy posterior stabilised total knee replacement. A total of 56 patients, half of whom received each design, were assessed pre-operatively and at one year after operation using knee scores and analysis of range of movement using electrogoniometry. For both implant designs there was a significant improvement in the function component of the knee scores (p < 0.001) and the maximum range of flexion when walking on the level, ascending and descending a slope or stairs (all p < 0.001), squatting (p = 0.020) and stepping into a bath (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference in outcome, including the maximum knee flexion, between patients receiving the standard and high flexion designs of this implant.sch_phy1. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, Axe MJ, Snyder-Macker L. Preoperative quadriceps strength predicts functional ability one year after total knee arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1533-9. 2. Parent E, Moffet H. Preoperative predictors of locomotor ability two months after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:36-50. 3. Maohomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in prediction functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002;29:1273-9. 4. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop 2002;404:172-88. 5. Schai PA, Gibson AJ, Scott RD. Kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: perception and reality. Clin Orthop 1999;367:195-200. 6. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop 2003;416:167-73. 7. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, et al. A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop 2004;428:174-9. 8. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker A, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:50-3. 9. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4. 10. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of movement after total knee arthroplasty: clustering log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:1278-85. 11. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey (Standard and Acute Forms): Lincoln: Quality Metric Incorporated. 2002. 12. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14. 13. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of the WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40. 14. Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:889-96. 15. Most E, Sultan PG, Park SE, Papannagari R. Li G. Tibiofemoral contact behaviour is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA. Clin Orthop 2006;452:59-64. 16. Gupta SK, Ranawat AG, Shah V, et al. The PFC Sigma RP-F TKA design for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006;29(Suppl):49-52. 17. Bin SI, Nam TS. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:350-6. 18. Kim YH, Sohn KG, Kim JS. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee prostheses: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;86-A:1470-5. 19. Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY. Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005;28(Suppl):1247-50. 20. Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early result of high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of two years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:674-9. 21. Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Hillmann SJ, Hazlewood ME. Validation of flexible electrogoniometry as a measure of joint kinematics. Physiotherapy 2001;87:479-88. 22. Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Walker CR, Nutton RW. Knee joint functional range of movement prior and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 2002;16:46-54. 23. van der Linden ML, Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Burnett R, Nutton RW. Knee kinematics in functional activities seven years after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007;22:537-42. 24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences . Second ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988. 25. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice . Second ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Health, 2000.90-Bpub677pub