The paper reviews the origins of critical IPE, arguing that the contrast it introduced between problem-solving and critical theory was flawed. Critical IPE has since been drawn into a subordinate relationship to hegemonic 'American' IPE, and failed to realise the potential of the research agenda set out by Cox in 1981. On the basis of the analysis of Nicola Phillips, Globalizing International Political Economy (2005) and Tony Payne, The Global Politics of Unequal Development (2005), and a brief discussion of their relationship with mainstream IPE, it is argued that both mainstream and critical IPE are so deeply flawed that they should be abandoned
This paper offers, first, a critique of the relative lack of economic theory in ‘British’ Global Pol...
The recent rise of populism has generated a resurgence of interest in critical theory, in the wider ...
Relatively early in the attempts to gender the discipline of International Relations (IR), it was ar...
In my contribution to this forum on IPE, my aim is to add further to the critical interventions in t...
Abstract In my contribution to this forum on IPE, my aim is to add further to the critical intervent...
Recent years have seen international political economy (IPE) become an increasingly bifurcated field...
The British school of International Political Economy (IPE) has been highly innovative in encouragin...
IPE is in need of critical self-reflection. A large proportion of scholars have rejected the Open Ec...
IPE is in need of critical self-reflection. Many or most scholars fail to be persuaded by the Open E...
This review article maps the positions of critical and cultural IPE within this diverse field. To th...
Challenging the assumptions of 'mainstream' International Political Economy (IPE), this Handbook dem...
The study of the International Political Economy (IPE), like the IPE itself, is plural and unbounded...
This article challenges three aspects of the 'American' school of international political economy (I...
This paper appraises the study of globalisation within International Political Economy (IPE). It als...
The British school of International Political Economy (IPE) has been highly innovative in encouragin...
This paper offers, first, a critique of the relative lack of economic theory in ‘British’ Global Pol...
The recent rise of populism has generated a resurgence of interest in critical theory, in the wider ...
Relatively early in the attempts to gender the discipline of International Relations (IR), it was ar...
In my contribution to this forum on IPE, my aim is to add further to the critical interventions in t...
Abstract In my contribution to this forum on IPE, my aim is to add further to the critical intervent...
Recent years have seen international political economy (IPE) become an increasingly bifurcated field...
The British school of International Political Economy (IPE) has been highly innovative in encouragin...
IPE is in need of critical self-reflection. A large proportion of scholars have rejected the Open Ec...
IPE is in need of critical self-reflection. Many or most scholars fail to be persuaded by the Open E...
This review article maps the positions of critical and cultural IPE within this diverse field. To th...
Challenging the assumptions of 'mainstream' International Political Economy (IPE), this Handbook dem...
The study of the International Political Economy (IPE), like the IPE itself, is plural and unbounded...
This article challenges three aspects of the 'American' school of international political economy (I...
This paper appraises the study of globalisation within International Political Economy (IPE). It als...
The British school of International Political Economy (IPE) has been highly innovative in encouragin...
This paper offers, first, a critique of the relative lack of economic theory in ‘British’ Global Pol...
The recent rise of populism has generated a resurgence of interest in critical theory, in the wider ...
Relatively early in the attempts to gender the discipline of International Relations (IR), it was ar...