This chapter is divided into two sections. The first section of this chapter analyses Italian cases concerning the ne bis in idem principle (also known as "double jeopardy"), namely case C-524/15 (Menci), currently pending before the CJEU, and joined cases C-217/15 and C-350/15 (Orsi and Baldetti), decided by the CJEU on 5 Aprii 2017. In both the above cases, the request for a preliminary ruling concerned the interpretation of the double jeopardy clause given effect in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in the light of Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the related case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The second...
The cases of Menci (C-524/15), Garlsson (C-537/16) and Di Puma (C-596/16 and C-597/16) deal with the...
The research is focused on the problems related to parallel criminal proceedings against the same p...
The three decisions discussed in this contribution concern the application article 24(2)(b) of the G...
The European Courts case law has taken new steps in developing the non bis in idem principle. This r...
It is sure that the ne bis in idem constitutes a fundamental right, protected by a plurality of nati...
In the national and supranational legal area, the need to address the ne bis in idem principle is ju...
The case note addresses three judgments the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU handed d...
The chapter deals with a decision issued by the CJEU (Cadeddu) and two pending cases (HB v INPS and ...
In its judgment no. 200 of 21 July 2016, the Italian Constitutional Court has declared the partial u...
This gloss discusses the position of the Court of Justice of the European Union taken in the judgmen...
reservedLa forte interdipendenza tra il diritto ed economia è particolarmente evidente nel rapporto ...
The principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined both in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European...
It is sure that the ne bis in idem constitutes a fundamental right, protected by a plurality of nati...
The preliminary ruling reference (C-194/15) from the Provincial Tax Court of Turin raises the issue ...
The legal principle of ne bis in idem restricts the possibility of a defendant being prosecuted repe...
The cases of Menci (C-524/15), Garlsson (C-537/16) and Di Puma (C-596/16 and C-597/16) deal with the...
The research is focused on the problems related to parallel criminal proceedings against the same p...
The three decisions discussed in this contribution concern the application article 24(2)(b) of the G...
The European Courts case law has taken new steps in developing the non bis in idem principle. This r...
It is sure that the ne bis in idem constitutes a fundamental right, protected by a plurality of nati...
In the national and supranational legal area, the need to address the ne bis in idem principle is ju...
The case note addresses three judgments the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU handed d...
The chapter deals with a decision issued by the CJEU (Cadeddu) and two pending cases (HB v INPS and ...
In its judgment no. 200 of 21 July 2016, the Italian Constitutional Court has declared the partial u...
This gloss discusses the position of the Court of Justice of the European Union taken in the judgmen...
reservedLa forte interdipendenza tra il diritto ed economia è particolarmente evidente nel rapporto ...
The principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined both in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European...
It is sure that the ne bis in idem constitutes a fundamental right, protected by a plurality of nati...
The preliminary ruling reference (C-194/15) from the Provincial Tax Court of Turin raises the issue ...
The legal principle of ne bis in idem restricts the possibility of a defendant being prosecuted repe...
The cases of Menci (C-524/15), Garlsson (C-537/16) and Di Puma (C-596/16 and C-597/16) deal with the...
The research is focused on the problems related to parallel criminal proceedings against the same p...
The three decisions discussed in this contribution concern the application article 24(2)(b) of the G...