Comparison of HIV-1 drug-resistance genotyping by ultra-deep sequencing and sanger sequencing using clinical samples

International audienceSanger population sequencing (SPS) is the reference technique to monitor HIV-1-infected patients' therapy. Ultra-deep sequencing (UDS), which allows quantitative detection of drug resistance mutations, may be an alternative method. The study aimed to compare reproducibility and predictions of UDS versus SPS in a routine setting. A control containing low-abundance variants was repeatedly tested and clinical plasma samples from 100 patients were prospectively assayed by SPS and UDS using the Roche 454 system. Complete analysis by UDS was available for 88% of samples with various viral loads and subtypes. Comparison of detection thresholds found that SPS sensitivity was variable. Variations found by UDS between 5% to \textgreater20% were detected by SPS in 25% to more than 80% of samples. At the 5% cut-off, disagreements were rare and in most cases UDS detected an additional protease secondary mutation, suggesting a possible resistance to a protease inhibitor according to the 2015 ANRS algorithm. Mutations found on reverse transcriptase by only UDS were often explained by previous therapy. UDS with a variant detection threshold at 5% might allow therapy management with minimal differences compared to population sequencing while providing additional information for further determination of pertinent cutoff values for specific resistance mutations