Central coercion or local autonomy - A comparative analysis of policy instrument choice in refugee settlement policies

Although existing literature on central local governance includes comprehensive studies on how constitutional and financial frameworks regulate local government autonomy, this study seeks explanation for the introduction or absence of central coercion within these frameworks. The analysis studies six processes of policy instrument choice with different outcomes in Norway, Denmark and Sweden in the field of refugee settlement. It finds that a uniform perception of crisis and political compromises make political parties abandon their political ideological standpoints relating to central local governance. Additionally, the success and failure of political strategies of obfuscation and of dividing the opposition help to explain the different outcomes. The study reveals differences in the political salience of central local governance in three countries that have systematically been categorized in the same groups in central local studies. Consequently, more studies on how and why local autonomy is regulated within national frameworks are necessary to understand the actual autonomy that local governments enjoy. The final version of this research has been published in Local Government Studies. © 2017 Taylor & Franci