EU officials have proposed the establishment of a permanent court for investment disputes. But there is no guarantee that bias, the reason for the lacking legitimacy of investment arbitration, does not affect judges. This Perspective suggests that it may be preferable for investment disputes to be settled by domestic courts
This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The...
A reflection on International Investment Arbitration and the Law of the European Union (EU) is an im...
Investor-treaty dispute settlement is used by States and investors to resolve disagreements that inv...
Growing criticism over investor-state arbitration has led to demands for reform from various countri...
The EU has presented a proposal to the US for an Investment Court system to resolve investor-state d...
The bilateral investment court system the EU buttressed since 2015 risks losing momentum in the face...
Any future Multilateral Investment Court’s independence and impartiality must be guaranteed. If it d...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive dev...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
Despite the original objective of investor state dispute settlement (“ISDS”)—to create an unbiased a...
INTRODUCTION. Disputes between investors and States are traditionally resolved through arbitration, ...
A reflection on International Investment Arbitration and the Law of the European Union (EU) is an im...
This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The...
A reflection on International Investment Arbitration and the Law of the European Union (EU) is an im...
Investor-treaty dispute settlement is used by States and investors to resolve disagreements that inv...
Growing criticism over investor-state arbitration has led to demands for reform from various countri...
The EU has presented a proposal to the US for an Investment Court system to resolve investor-state d...
The bilateral investment court system the EU buttressed since 2015 risks losing momentum in the face...
Any future Multilateral Investment Court’s independence and impartiality must be guaranteed. If it d...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive dev...
International audienceRampant discontent with the current system that governs the protection of inte...
Despite the original objective of investor state dispute settlement (“ISDS”)—to create an unbiased a...
INTRODUCTION. Disputes between investors and States are traditionally resolved through arbitration, ...
A reflection on International Investment Arbitration and the Law of the European Union (EU) is an im...
This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The...
A reflection on International Investment Arbitration and the Law of the European Union (EU) is an im...
Investor-treaty dispute settlement is used by States and investors to resolve disagreements that inv...