The executive branch is often called upon to assess how a particular statute it is charged to administer fits within the larger framework of the law. Professor Dawn Johnsen’s thoughtful analysis addresses an important subset of these challenges: situations in which the President believes a particular statute is inconsistent with one or another provision of the Constitution and, therefore, should not be enforced. My purpose here is to explore the context of executive non-enforcement more broadly, in a way that may help in understanding the particular problem she addresses
Some constitutional theorists defend unbounded executive power to respond to emergencies or expansiv...
The relationship between the American president and the rule of law appears at first obvious, but is...
The Constitution charges the President with the duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully execu...
Strauss explores the context of executive non-enforcement in a broad way that may help in understand...
This article, published in Law & Contemporary Problems, was presented at a Duke Law School confere...
A Constitution that strongly separates legislative from executive activity makes it difficult to rec...
Barron challenges the court-centered approach to the scope of the President\u27s non-enforcement pow...
Recent Presidents have claimed wide-ranging authority to decline enforcement of federal laws. The Ob...
The framers of the U.S. Constitution envisioned a government consisting of three branches, each with...
Enforcement of law is at the core of the President’s constitutional duty to “take Care” that the law...
This Article explores the appropriate role of the executive branch in enforcing and defending feder...
Enforcement of law is at the core of the President’s constitutional duty to “take Care” that the law...
This article attempts to analyze to what extent the scope of executive privilege, constitutionally c...
Accommodating our Eighteenth Century Constitution to the government that Congress has shaped in the ...
Congress has granted the President enormous power. This is well known, but how we are to assess the...
Some constitutional theorists defend unbounded executive power to respond to emergencies or expansiv...
The relationship between the American president and the rule of law appears at first obvious, but is...
The Constitution charges the President with the duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully execu...
Strauss explores the context of executive non-enforcement in a broad way that may help in understand...
This article, published in Law & Contemporary Problems, was presented at a Duke Law School confere...
A Constitution that strongly separates legislative from executive activity makes it difficult to rec...
Barron challenges the court-centered approach to the scope of the President\u27s non-enforcement pow...
Recent Presidents have claimed wide-ranging authority to decline enforcement of federal laws. The Ob...
The framers of the U.S. Constitution envisioned a government consisting of three branches, each with...
Enforcement of law is at the core of the President’s constitutional duty to “take Care” that the law...
This Article explores the appropriate role of the executive branch in enforcing and defending feder...
Enforcement of law is at the core of the President’s constitutional duty to “take Care” that the law...
This article attempts to analyze to what extent the scope of executive privilege, constitutionally c...
Accommodating our Eighteenth Century Constitution to the government that Congress has shaped in the ...
Congress has granted the President enormous power. This is well known, but how we are to assess the...
Some constitutional theorists defend unbounded executive power to respond to emergencies or expansiv...
The relationship between the American president and the rule of law appears at first obvious, but is...
The Constitution charges the President with the duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully execu...