Robert Jervis of Columbia University offers a reformulation of the debate between realism and neoliberalism over the role of conflict and cooperation in international politics. Jervis argues that the disagreement between realists and neoliberals is not about the extent of conflict, but rather whether conflict is unnecessary given states' quest for security. He then explains the disagreement in the context of what realists and neoliberalists contend is required to facilitate greater international cooperation. Finally, Jervis seeks to elucidate the different perceptions of the two schools of thought on the importance of institutions
This article examines the existing literatures on the debates of International Relations Theory sin...
This article reviews the recent debate on realism in political theory (including the articles in thi...
No scholar better exemplifies the intellectual challenges foisted on the Neorealist school of intern...
Abstract: Following the collapse of the bipolar world realist approaches were placed under close scr...
The debate between realists and neoliberals focuses on two issues: (1) delineating the goals that be...
Although the debate between realism and neoliberalism offers deep insights and raises fundamental qu...
Although the debate between realism and neoliberalism offers deep insights and raises fundamental qu...
This essay examines and reformulates the realist-neoliberal debate. Focusing initially on the issue ...
This paper aims to analyze and compare the both international relations paradigms: Neorealism and Ne...
The academic study of international relations can be considered a debate about realism. Realism prov...
ABSTRACT. This article constructs a test of the logical consistency of neorealism and neoliberalism ...
Despite growing interest in the promises and problems of theoretical synthesis among political scien...
The discussion of international politics remains preoccupied with a construct called "realist t...
The continued commitment to and assertion of the primacy of the sovereign state within international...
Since the end of the Cold War, old-fashioned power plays have been back in international relations, ...
This article examines the existing literatures on the debates of International Relations Theory sin...
This article reviews the recent debate on realism in political theory (including the articles in thi...
No scholar better exemplifies the intellectual challenges foisted on the Neorealist school of intern...
Abstract: Following the collapse of the bipolar world realist approaches were placed under close scr...
The debate between realists and neoliberals focuses on two issues: (1) delineating the goals that be...
Although the debate between realism and neoliberalism offers deep insights and raises fundamental qu...
Although the debate between realism and neoliberalism offers deep insights and raises fundamental qu...
This essay examines and reformulates the realist-neoliberal debate. Focusing initially on the issue ...
This paper aims to analyze and compare the both international relations paradigms: Neorealism and Ne...
The academic study of international relations can be considered a debate about realism. Realism prov...
ABSTRACT. This article constructs a test of the logical consistency of neorealism and neoliberalism ...
Despite growing interest in the promises and problems of theoretical synthesis among political scien...
The discussion of international politics remains preoccupied with a construct called "realist t...
The continued commitment to and assertion of the primacy of the sovereign state within international...
Since the end of the Cold War, old-fashioned power plays have been back in international relations, ...
This article examines the existing literatures on the debates of International Relations Theory sin...
This article reviews the recent debate on realism in political theory (including the articles in thi...
No scholar better exemplifies the intellectual challenges foisted on the Neorealist school of intern...