The popular slogan NIMBY—Not in My Back Yard—captures a classic dilemma that confronts policymakers: Although society as a whole requires certain basic public goods, such as energy supplies, improved infrastructure, and transportation hubs, individual communities are often unwilling to bear the localized costs and externalities of hosting these installations. In this fresh, insightful, and creative study, Daniel Aldrich explores the ways in which states decide to site controversial facilities and the types of instruments that public agencies employ to respond to societal opposition against these siting decisions
The research focuses on public opposition to the extension of South East New Territories (SENT) Land...
The disposal of designated radioactive contaminated waste resulting from the Fukushima nuclear accid...
Policymakers anticipate strong local opposition to undesirable land-uses, such as large-scale landfi...
While a large literature exists on the siting of controversial facilities, few theories about spatia...
How do communities respond to the proposed placement of controversial facilities in their backyards?...
Negative reaction to undesirable facilities in one’s neighborhood--“not in my back yard”--isn’t limi...
[Extract] The development or siting of unwanted facilities remains a major policy problem for indust...
The conflict between the provision of facilities that provide public service and the community respo...
The conflict over solid waste management continues to escalate in many parts of the country and is l...
1 It is the responsibility of Government to maintain and renew societal infrastructure. This means t...
Building regionally necessary but locally noxious facilities such as power plants, landfills, waste ...
The seeming paralysis in siting waste disposal facilities and other new facilities in Maine and othe...
The purpose of this study, Controversial Facilities in Japan, 1955 – 1995, is to understand the fact...
Proponents of hazardous and nuclear waste depositories label opponents to local siting of such facil...
The siting of large industrial facilities represents a difficult planning problem. Despite decades o...
The research focuses on public opposition to the extension of South East New Territories (SENT) Land...
The disposal of designated radioactive contaminated waste resulting from the Fukushima nuclear accid...
Policymakers anticipate strong local opposition to undesirable land-uses, such as large-scale landfi...
While a large literature exists on the siting of controversial facilities, few theories about spatia...
How do communities respond to the proposed placement of controversial facilities in their backyards?...
Negative reaction to undesirable facilities in one’s neighborhood--“not in my back yard”--isn’t limi...
[Extract] The development or siting of unwanted facilities remains a major policy problem for indust...
The conflict between the provision of facilities that provide public service and the community respo...
The conflict over solid waste management continues to escalate in many parts of the country and is l...
1 It is the responsibility of Government to maintain and renew societal infrastructure. This means t...
Building regionally necessary but locally noxious facilities such as power plants, landfills, waste ...
The seeming paralysis in siting waste disposal facilities and other new facilities in Maine and othe...
The purpose of this study, Controversial Facilities in Japan, 1955 – 1995, is to understand the fact...
Proponents of hazardous and nuclear waste depositories label opponents to local siting of such facil...
The siting of large industrial facilities represents a difficult planning problem. Despite decades o...
The research focuses on public opposition to the extension of South East New Territories (SENT) Land...
The disposal of designated radioactive contaminated waste resulting from the Fukushima nuclear accid...
Policymakers anticipate strong local opposition to undesirable land-uses, such as large-scale landfi...