Add to ORKGGreen Box subsidies, by definition of the World Trade Organization (WTO), are not allowed to distort trade. This is why, under the terms of the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), countries may provide as many Green Box subsidies as they like. ActionAid, CIDSE, and Oxfam believe, as this briefing note will show, that the EU and the USA are using this provision to continue to give support that is manifestly trade-distorting, thereby causing serious damage to farmers in developing countries. At least $40bn of Green Box payments annually are likely to be trade-distorting and therefore break WTO rules
The vast majority of domestic support to farmers in the European Union (EU) is notified in the World...
A major achievement of the so-called Uruguay Round (the round of world trade negotiations from the m...
Recent reform of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has led to a further decoupling of far...
This paper focuses on the compatibility of U.S. agri-environmental programs with the Green Box provi...
Agricultural support systems in OECD countries have experienced an important change in the last 15 y...
The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) was adopted to eliminate the illegitimate use of tradedistorting ...
Many rural communities in Europe are distinctively dependent on farming. Also, the very close associ...
Report finds that the WTO legal ruling on commodity subsidies may provide opportunity to gain suppor...
A recent World Bank 'Trade Note' has reviewed the WTO approach to the disciplining of...
This paper focuses on the third pillar of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (URAA) of the W...
Recent reform of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has led to a further decoupling of farm s...
The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture classified some subsidies as "Green Box" measures and pre...
The Uruguay Round’s Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) categorized “domestic support” according to its p...
The impact of domestic support on trade is likely to become an increasingly important issue in the W...
A review of the WTO agricultural negotiations and their implications for developing countries is the...
The vast majority of domestic support to farmers in the European Union (EU) is notified in the World...
A major achievement of the so-called Uruguay Round (the round of world trade negotiations from the m...
Recent reform of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has led to a further decoupling of far...
This paper focuses on the compatibility of U.S. agri-environmental programs with the Green Box provi...
Agricultural support systems in OECD countries have experienced an important change in the last 15 y...
The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) was adopted to eliminate the illegitimate use of tradedistorting ...
Many rural communities in Europe are distinctively dependent on farming. Also, the very close associ...
Report finds that the WTO legal ruling on commodity subsidies may provide opportunity to gain suppor...
A recent World Bank 'Trade Note' has reviewed the WTO approach to the disciplining of...
This paper focuses on the third pillar of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (URAA) of the W...
Recent reform of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has led to a further decoupling of farm s...
The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture classified some subsidies as "Green Box" measures and pre...
The Uruguay Round’s Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) categorized “domestic support” according to its p...
The impact of domestic support on trade is likely to become an increasingly important issue in the W...
A review of the WTO agricultural negotiations and their implications for developing countries is the...
The vast majority of domestic support to farmers in the European Union (EU) is notified in the World...
A major achievement of the so-called Uruguay Round (the round of world trade negotiations from the m...
Recent reform of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has led to a further decoupling of far...