Objective To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of restricted fluid bolus volume (10 mL/kg) versus recommended practice (20 mL/kg). Design Nine-month pilot RCT with embedded mixed-method perspectives study. Setting 13 hospitals in England. Patients Children presenting to emergency departments with suspected infection and shock after 20 mL/kg fluid. Interventions Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to further 10 or 20 mL/kg fluid boluses every 15 min for up to 4 hours if still in shock. Main outcome measures These were based on progression criteria, including recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, separation, potential trial outcome measures, and parent and staff perspectives. Results...
Introduction: Septic shock in children still carries substantial mortality and morbidity. While resu...
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite evidence that preferential use of balanced/buffered fluids may improve outc...
Purpose: We assessed the effects of a protocol restricting resuscitation fluid vs. a standard care p...
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of r...
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of r...
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. Objective T...
Background: There has been no randomised controlled trial (RCT) of fluid bolus therapy in paediatric...
This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or ...
Objective The Fluids in Shock (FiSh) Trial proposes to evaluate whether restrictive fluid bolus ther...
Objectives & BackgroundThere is increasing evidence that fluid overload may be associated with harm ...
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crysta...
Objectives: Fluid bolus resuscitation in African children is harmful. Little research has evaluated ...
Abstract Background Current pediatric septic shock re...
Background: Guidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crysta...
Introduction: Septic shock in children still carries substantial mortality and morbidity. While resu...
Introduction: Septic shock in children still carries substantial mortality and morbidity. While resu...
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite evidence that preferential use of balanced/buffered fluids may improve outc...
Purpose: We assessed the effects of a protocol restricting resuscitation fluid vs. a standard care p...
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of r...
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of r...
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. Objective T...
Background: There has been no randomised controlled trial (RCT) of fluid bolus therapy in paediatric...
This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or ...
Objective The Fluids in Shock (FiSh) Trial proposes to evaluate whether restrictive fluid bolus ther...
Objectives & BackgroundThere is increasing evidence that fluid overload may be associated with harm ...
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crysta...
Objectives: Fluid bolus resuscitation in African children is harmful. Little research has evaluated ...
Abstract Background Current pediatric septic shock re...
Background: Guidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crysta...
Introduction: Septic shock in children still carries substantial mortality and morbidity. While resu...
Introduction: Septic shock in children still carries substantial mortality and morbidity. While resu...
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite evidence that preferential use of balanced/buffered fluids may improve outc...
Purpose: We assessed the effects of a protocol restricting resuscitation fluid vs. a standard care p...