We present a formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganzinger’s chapter on resolution theorem proving in Isabelle/HOL, culminating with a refutationally complete first-order prover based on ordered resolution with literal selection. We develop general infrastructure and methodology that can form the basis of completeness proofs for related calculi, including superposition. Our work clarifies several of the fine points in the chapter’s text, emphasizing the value of formal proofs in the field of automated reasoning
We extend previous results about resolution and superposition with ordering \u000Aconstraints and se...
AbstractCompletion theorem proving, as proposed by J. Hsiang (1982), is based on the observation tha...
This paper describes the integration of zChaff and MiniSat, currently two leading SAT solvers, with ...
We present an Isabelle/HOL formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganzinger’s chapter on re...
International audienceWe present a formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganz-inger's chap...
The superposition calculus, which underlies first-order theorem provers such as E, SPASS, and Vampir...
We present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for proving the completeness...
We review the fundamental resolution-based methods for first-order theorem proving and present them ...
We review the fundamental resolution-based methods for first-order theorem proving and present them ...
International audienceWe present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for pr...
We modify Bezem's (Bezem, M. Completeness of Resolution Revisited. Theoretical Computer Science 74 (...
Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much e#ort to prove theorems. Re...
Abstract. Computer-generated proofs are usually difficult to grasp for a human reader. In this paper...
Abstract. Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much effort to prove th...
We investigate several approaches to resolution based automated theorem proving in classical higher-...
We extend previous results about resolution and superposition with ordering \u000Aconstraints and se...
AbstractCompletion theorem proving, as proposed by J. Hsiang (1982), is based on the observation tha...
This paper describes the integration of zChaff and MiniSat, currently two leading SAT solvers, with ...
We present an Isabelle/HOL formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganzinger’s chapter on re...
International audienceWe present a formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganz-inger's chap...
The superposition calculus, which underlies first-order theorem provers such as E, SPASS, and Vampir...
We present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for proving the completeness...
We review the fundamental resolution-based methods for first-order theorem proving and present them ...
We review the fundamental resolution-based methods for first-order theorem proving and present them ...
International audienceWe present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for pr...
We modify Bezem's (Bezem, M. Completeness of Resolution Revisited. Theoretical Computer Science 74 (...
Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much e#ort to prove theorems. Re...
Abstract. Computer-generated proofs are usually difficult to grasp for a human reader. In this paper...
Abstract. Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much effort to prove th...
We investigate several approaches to resolution based automated theorem proving in classical higher-...
We extend previous results about resolution and superposition with ordering \u000Aconstraints and se...
AbstractCompletion theorem proving, as proposed by J. Hsiang (1982), is based on the observation tha...
This paper describes the integration of zChaff and MiniSat, currently two leading SAT solvers, with ...