<p>Friedman’s rank test for the 120 instance combination of the benchmarked problem of GADP, SADP, SOS, and SOS-LPT using their average <i>C</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> values.</p
<p>Ranks of MSCLPSO, CMPSO, MOEA/D, and NSGA-II in term of the mean IGD results on all the benchmark...
<p>*** = p <0.001</p><p>** = p <0.01</p><p>* = p <0.05, ns = not significant.</p><p>Results of the W...
Abstract Background The Friedm...
<p>Friedman’s rank test for the 180 instance combination of the benchmarked problem of ACO, ACOII, S...
<p>Rankings of the algorithms by the Friedman’s test on the basic benchmark functions.</p
<p>The average ranks of the Friedman test for the seven different classifiers using the additive enc...
<p>Rankings of the algorithms by the Friedman’s test on the CEC2005’s shifted functions.</p
Results of pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank tests (p-values) for the various materials as specified in ...
<p>Rankings by the Friedman’s test on the CEC2005’s shifted functions with different <i>κ</i>.</p
<p>Scores obtained from Friedman rank sum tests with Holm correction for choices of with fixed at ...
<p>Experimental results for 15 replicated runs of SADP, GADP2, SOS, and SOS-LPT algorithms.</p
<p>* = p <0.05, ns = not significant.</p><p>Results of the Wilcoxon rank sum tests among the best Ma...
<p>The symbol “*” implies that the Friedman's test was statistically significant (P-V<0.05).</p><p>T...
Comparison of the median and maximum Satoyama Index values between the SEPL sites and randomly gener...
<p>Results of a Friedman test to compare prediction methods across different datasets and feature se...
<p>Ranks of MSCLPSO, CMPSO, MOEA/D, and NSGA-II in term of the mean IGD results on all the benchmark...
<p>*** = p <0.001</p><p>** = p <0.01</p><p>* = p <0.05, ns = not significant.</p><p>Results of the W...
Abstract Background The Friedm...
<p>Friedman’s rank test for the 180 instance combination of the benchmarked problem of ACO, ACOII, S...
<p>Rankings of the algorithms by the Friedman’s test on the basic benchmark functions.</p
<p>The average ranks of the Friedman test for the seven different classifiers using the additive enc...
<p>Rankings of the algorithms by the Friedman’s test on the CEC2005’s shifted functions.</p
Results of pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank tests (p-values) for the various materials as specified in ...
<p>Rankings by the Friedman’s test on the CEC2005’s shifted functions with different <i>κ</i>.</p
<p>Scores obtained from Friedman rank sum tests with Holm correction for choices of with fixed at ...
<p>Experimental results for 15 replicated runs of SADP, GADP2, SOS, and SOS-LPT algorithms.</p
<p>* = p <0.05, ns = not significant.</p><p>Results of the Wilcoxon rank sum tests among the best Ma...
<p>The symbol “*” implies that the Friedman's test was statistically significant (P-V<0.05).</p><p>T...
Comparison of the median and maximum Satoyama Index values between the SEPL sites and randomly gener...
<p>Results of a Friedman test to compare prediction methods across different datasets and feature se...
<p>Ranks of MSCLPSO, CMPSO, MOEA/D, and NSGA-II in term of the mean IGD results on all the benchmark...
<p>*** = p <0.001</p><p>** = p <0.01</p><p>* = p <0.05, ns = not significant.</p><p>Results of the W...
Abstract Background The Friedm...
DOI
Add to ORKG