<p>The four barrier categories (columns) and 14 sub-categories (rows) reported by participants.</p
<p>The four main categories of possible reasons for identified workarounds with the themes and sub-t...
<p>Responses were categorized according to the subjects’ assessment of their confidence in their abi...
<p>Overview of the eight different experimental groups, which were tested in the study.</p
<p>The two needs categories (columns) and 16 sub-categories(rows) reported by participants.</p
<p>The two expectation categories (columns) and eight sub-categories (rows) reported by participants...
<p>The composition of teams in the study for the four experimental conditions (columns) and gender (...
Summary of findings showing how the four themes relate to each other and the categories within each ...
<p>*Factors cited in multiple subcategories were counted as one for the respective main category.</p
The rows indicate opinion groups and the columns indicate respondent groups. In each table, the two ...
<p>Number of observations, interviews and focus groups by category of respondents.</p
Descriptive statistics for the number of trials in each perceived valence category.</p
<p>The first column denotes the experiment, the second the number of word tokens the learner heard a...
Bar chart showing the frequency of topic categories (present vs. not present) for all study particip...
The accuracies of the two-class classifications at the four CNR levels for the six classifiers.</p
<p>The number of each type of prey presentation made in sessions for all four experimental groups.</...
<p>The four main categories of possible reasons for identified workarounds with the themes and sub-t...
<p>Responses were categorized according to the subjects’ assessment of their confidence in their abi...
<p>Overview of the eight different experimental groups, which were tested in the study.</p
<p>The two needs categories (columns) and 16 sub-categories(rows) reported by participants.</p
<p>The two expectation categories (columns) and eight sub-categories (rows) reported by participants...
<p>The composition of teams in the study for the four experimental conditions (columns) and gender (...
Summary of findings showing how the four themes relate to each other and the categories within each ...
<p>*Factors cited in multiple subcategories were counted as one for the respective main category.</p
The rows indicate opinion groups and the columns indicate respondent groups. In each table, the two ...
<p>Number of observations, interviews and focus groups by category of respondents.</p
Descriptive statistics for the number of trials in each perceived valence category.</p
<p>The first column denotes the experiment, the second the number of word tokens the learner heard a...
Bar chart showing the frequency of topic categories (present vs. not present) for all study particip...
The accuracies of the two-class classifications at the four CNR levels for the six classifiers.</p
<p>The number of each type of prey presentation made in sessions for all four experimental groups.</...
<p>The four main categories of possible reasons for identified workarounds with the themes and sub-t...
<p>Responses were categorized according to the subjects’ assessment of their confidence in their abi...
<p>Overview of the eight different experimental groups, which were tested in the study.</p