<p>Stacked bar plots of predictions according to club membership (Panel A), gender (Panel B), and age category (Panel C; ‘46+’ is runners aged 46 and older. Prediction proportions less than .1 are not labelled.</p
This table depicts the average R2, mean square error, median absolute error and R2 95% confidence in...
<p>The HDP is at the top and the age-gender interaction ADDP is at the bottom. Male and female runne...
<p>In the Fig 4 are reported the R<sup>2</sup> coefficients, as indices of prediction goodness, resu...
<p>Three panels plotting the proportions of runners whose performance was better (faster) than predi...
<p>Panels A, B, and C show stacked bar plots plotting categorical discrepancy—the proportions of run...
<p>Violin plots of finish time density according to club membership (Panel A), gender (Panel B) and ...
<p>Prediction accuracy for women (solid line) and men (dashed line) by age in each self-ascribed eth...
<p>Panel A shows the proportion of predictions collapsed across all years. Panels B and C shows stac...
<p>Violin plots of finish time density according to prediction and club membership (Panel A), gender...
<p>(Top) Men. (Bottom) Women. The legend shows the different age groups considered.</p
(*) indicates statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Chance line shown at 50%. Bars indicate...
Outliers not shown. *signifies a significant difference in the distribution of contact numbers betwe...
<p>The whiskers (error bars) above and below each box represent the 90<sup>th</sup> and 10<sup>th</s...
<p>Relative age distribution by gender and categories of selected and corresponding unselected athle...
International audienceMetacognition is a domain which has illuminated our understanding of the regul...
This table depicts the average R2, mean square error, median absolute error and R2 95% confidence in...
<p>The HDP is at the top and the age-gender interaction ADDP is at the bottom. Male and female runne...
<p>In the Fig 4 are reported the R<sup>2</sup> coefficients, as indices of prediction goodness, resu...
<p>Three panels plotting the proportions of runners whose performance was better (faster) than predi...
<p>Panels A, B, and C show stacked bar plots plotting categorical discrepancy—the proportions of run...
<p>Violin plots of finish time density according to club membership (Panel A), gender (Panel B) and ...
<p>Prediction accuracy for women (solid line) and men (dashed line) by age in each self-ascribed eth...
<p>Panel A shows the proportion of predictions collapsed across all years. Panels B and C shows stac...
<p>Violin plots of finish time density according to prediction and club membership (Panel A), gender...
<p>(Top) Men. (Bottom) Women. The legend shows the different age groups considered.</p
(*) indicates statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Chance line shown at 50%. Bars indicate...
Outliers not shown. *signifies a significant difference in the distribution of contact numbers betwe...
<p>The whiskers (error bars) above and below each box represent the 90<sup>th</sup> and 10<sup>th</s...
<p>Relative age distribution by gender and categories of selected and corresponding unselected athle...
International audienceMetacognition is a domain which has illuminated our understanding of the regul...
This table depicts the average R2, mean square error, median absolute error and R2 95% confidence in...
<p>The HDP is at the top and the age-gender interaction ADDP is at the bottom. Male and female runne...
<p>In the Fig 4 are reported the R<sup>2</sup> coefficients, as indices of prediction goodness, resu...
DOI
Add to ORKG