Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study

International audienceBACKGROUND: Causes of weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are still controversial. The impact of the size of the sleeve continues to be debated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the impact of sleeve volumes assessed at 3 months using gastric computed tomography (CT) on weight loss at 18 months. SETTING: University Hospital, France. METHODS: Sixty-seven obese patients eligible for SG were prospectively evaluated. Sleeve volumes were assessed postsurgery using 3-dimensional gastric CT with gas at 3 months and weight loss outcomes recorded up to 18 months. The population was divided into 2 groups: the first tertile (n = 22) with the smallest gastric volume was defined as the "small sleeve" group (SSG) and the rest of the population (n = 45) was defined as the "without small sleeve" group (WSSG). RESULTS: No patients were lost to follow-up. In the SSG, overall gastric volume was 133+/-7 mL versus 264+/-11 mL for the WSSG (P\textless.0001). Percentage excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) during the first postoperative 18 months was significantly greater in the SSG compared with the WSSG (P = .04). Although the volume of the gastric tube was not correlated with weight loss (r =-.04, P = .78), there was a negative linear correlation between the volume of the antrum and the %EBMIL at 18 months (r =-.39, P = .005). A narrow gastric tube was also associated with a high digestive intolerance and reflux. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that performing the sleeve with a not-too-small bougie size and a radical antrectomy could improve weight loss and digestive tolerance