Publication plays a pivotal role in the growth and dissemination of scientific knowledge. But the growth of knowledge is neither strictly linear nor unidirectional. Mistakes are made. Retraction is one means by which the scientific record is corrected. In this paper, we examine the retraction practices and prevalence in the journal Science. We focus on 35 years of published retractions, from 1983 to 2017. We are not only concerned with determining the scope of the problem, but also the patterns in the data. From a policy perspective, knowledge of any patterns in retractions may be useful in developing targeted responses to deal with the root causes
Reports on the preliminary results of an empirical study of post-retraction citations of biomedical ...
Retractions play an important role in research communication by highlighting and explaining how rese...
Science is a dynamic subject and it was never free of misconduct or bad research. Indeed, the scient...
Publication plays a pivotal role in the growth and dissemination of scientific knowledge. But the g...
This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings ...
This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings ...
This evidence-based opinion piece gives a short overview of the increase in retractions of publicati...
Background: The number of retracted scientific publications has risen sharply, but it is unclear whe...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
We investigate the citation frequency of retracted scientific papers in science. For the period of f...
A retraction in science is the removal of a scientific paper from the literature’s records. Formerly...
Although the validity of knowledge is critical to scientific progress, substantial concerns exist re...
In the scholarly publishing domain, a retraction is raised when a specific publication is considered...
Purpose Although retractions are commonly considered to be negative, the fact remains that they play...
The retraction is receiving a growing amount of attention as an important event in scientific and sc...
Reports on the preliminary results of an empirical study of post-retraction citations of biomedical ...
Retractions play an important role in research communication by highlighting and explaining how rese...
Science is a dynamic subject and it was never free of misconduct or bad research. Indeed, the scient...
Publication plays a pivotal role in the growth and dissemination of scientific knowledge. But the g...
This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings ...
This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings ...
This evidence-based opinion piece gives a short overview of the increase in retractions of publicati...
Background: The number of retracted scientific publications has risen sharply, but it is unclear whe...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
We investigate the citation frequency of retracted scientific papers in science. For the period of f...
A retraction in science is the removal of a scientific paper from the literature’s records. Formerly...
Although the validity of knowledge is critical to scientific progress, substantial concerns exist re...
In the scholarly publishing domain, a retraction is raised when a specific publication is considered...
Purpose Although retractions are commonly considered to be negative, the fact remains that they play...
The retraction is receiving a growing amount of attention as an important event in scientific and sc...
Reports on the preliminary results of an empirical study of post-retraction citations of biomedical ...
Retractions play an important role in research communication by highlighting and explaining how rese...
Science is a dynamic subject and it was never free of misconduct or bad research. Indeed, the scient...