Double-blind peer review and gender publication bias
- Engqvist, Leif
- Frommen, Joachim G
DOIAbstract
Engqvist L, Frommen JG. Double-blind peer review and gender publication bias. Animal Behaviour. 2008;76(3):e1-e2
Engqvist L, Frommen JG. Double-blind peer review and gender publication bias. Animal Behaviour. 2008;76(3):e1-e2
International audienceMale researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engine...
Abstract Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid impli...
Gender bias in the sciences is a prominent issue. Evidence suggests that more equal involvement of w...
To date, the majority of authors on scientific publications have been men. While much of this gender...
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer are identified, is rarely practised i...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference...
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely prac...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
This article examines gender bias in peer review with complete data on 145 journals in various field...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
There is substantial evidence that systemic biases influence the scholarly peer review process. Many...
One way to explore whether gender bias exists in the process of scientific publishing is to examine ...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
International audienceMale researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engine...
Abstract Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid impli...
Gender bias in the sciences is a prominent issue. Evidence suggests that more equal involvement of w...
To date, the majority of authors on scientific publications have been men. While much of this gender...
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer are identified, is rarely practised i...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference...
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely prac...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
This article examines gender bias in peer review with complete data on 145 journals in various field...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
There is substantial evidence that systemic biases influence the scholarly peer review process. Many...
One way to explore whether gender bias exists in the process of scientific publishing is to examine ...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
International audienceMale researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engine...
Abstract Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid impli...
Gender bias in the sciences is a prominent issue. Evidence suggests that more equal involvement of w...
Add to ORKG