G TOUR Pro??? ??????????????? ?????? ??????

??? ????????? G TOUR Pro??? ?????????????????? ????????? ??????, ????????????, ?????????????????????, ??????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ????????? ??????. ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ??? ????????? ????????? 2017.08.12. ???????????? m pop 4??? ?????? ????????? ????????? G TOUR Pro??? 2017.08.19. ??????????????? 4??? ????????? ????????? W G TOUR Pro ??? 177?????? ???????????? ??????????????????, ????????? ?????? ??? ??? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??? 142?????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ???????????????. ??? ???????????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ??? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??? ??? ??????????????????, ????????? ????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????????. ?????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????????(content validity), ????????? ????????????(exploratiry factor analysis), ???????????????(reliability analysis)??? ???????????? ???????????????. ????????? ????????? ????????? SPSS 21.0??? ??????????????????, ????????????(correlation analysis) ??? ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? t-test??? ???????????????. ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????????. ??????, G TOUR Pro??? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????????. ??????, G TOUR Pro??? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ???????????????, ???????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????????. ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????????, ???????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ??????, G TOUR Pro??? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ???????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????? ????????????????????? ?????? ??????????????????, ???????????? ?????? ?????????????????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ???????????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ??????, G TOUR Pro??? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ???????????? ???????????? 72??? ?????? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????????????. ???????????? ???????????? 72??? ????????? 72??? ???????????? ?????? ???????????????, ???????????? ????????? ???????????? 72??? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ????????????. ?????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? 72??? ????????? 72??? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????????????.The purpose of this study is to analyze the demographic characteristics of G TOUR Pro, such as gender, prize status, professional golf qualification, and average number of strokes. In order to achieve this goal, 177 participants who joined the fourth final round, sponsored by Samsung Securities m Gourd TOUR Pro, and the fourth final round, sponsored by LOTTE rent-a-car were selected. A total of 142 questionnaires were used for the actual analysis, except for those parts of the extracted data . The research tools used in this study were questionnaires. The surveys were carried out after the visit surveys were done sufficiently before the start of the game, and samples were selected using the convenience sampling method. In addition, all items and variables were verified by content validity, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis through expert meetings in previous studies and sports psychology. The collected data were processed using SPSS 21.0 and independent t-test was performed for correlation analysis and hypothesis testing. Through the above - the procedure and the method of the study derived following results in below. First, according to the gender of G TOUR Pro, there was a difference in the attribution of success and failure. Success attribution mentality was more highly attributed to males than females. Second, there was a difference in the attribution of success and failure depending on the prize presence or absence of G TOUR Pro. Success attribution mentality was found to be higher perceived by winning career, and successful attribution effort was highly perceived by winning career. Furthermore, it was shown that the succeeded condition was more highly attributed to the group having the winning career. On the other hand, failure mentality has more lower mentality than the former group. Third, there was a difference in the golf professional qualification of G TOUR Pro. In success attributive leadership, the associate professional was perceived to be higher than the real member professional. Failed self-esteem was found to be more attributive than regular associate professional. Fourth, there was a difference in the attribution of success according to the average number of strokes of G TOUR Pro. Success attribution mentality was more perceived by groups less than 72 strokes. Failed self-esteem was higher than 72 strokes or more than 72 or less, and psychological burden of failure was more than 72 strokes or more perceived. In addition, the failure attributed to mental retardation was found to be attributed more than 72 strokes to more than 72.Maste