Women’s ‘Bodies’ and Biotechnological Research: The Unfixed Future of Bodily Materials and Donors’ Intervention in Scientific Research

?????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????, ??????, ????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ??? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????. ??? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????, ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????. ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ‘?????????????????? ???’????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ??? ???????????? ???????????????. ?????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????, ?????? ?????? ‘?????????’??? ???????????? ??? ????????? ????????? ?????????, ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????, ????????? ‘?????????’????????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ??????. ????????? ?????? ‘?????????’??? ?????? ????????? ‘????????? ???’?????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ????????????. ?????? ?????? '?????? ??????'(regenerative labor) ????????? ????????? ???????????? ‘????????????’?????? ???????????? ????????? ????????????, ???????????????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ‘????????????’ ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????????. ??????????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????(agency)??? ???????????????, ?????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????????, ?????? ?????????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????????.Women’s reproductive tissues, such as eggs, embryos, and umbilical cord blood, have become important raw materials for biotechnological research, including stem cell research. As a result, this controversial issue has spawned two contested discourses: ‘body recycling’ versus ‘sacred body.’ In the discourse of ‘body recycling’, women’s reproductive tissues are figured as ‘waste’ that, instead of being discarded, are simply recycled. This stance legitimizes the use of reproductive tissues for research, while it undervalues donors’ contributions and rights. By contrast, critical approaches to biotechnology meaningfully portray such practices as violations of women’s body, and underscore the health risks to women which the ‘body recycling’ discourses have overlooked. However, in the discourse of ‘bodily integrity/sacredness,’ advocates rely on a modernist concept of ‘the body’ which is singular, essential, and universal, and often represent women as passive ‘victims’. Seeking to transcend these binaristic positions, this paper examines the concept of 'regenerative labor' and the studies of ‘donors’ as active participants. These approaches focus on both the recognition of donors’ contributions, and the unfixed future of bodily materials. The latter part of this paper discusses the multiple formations of donor agency, and agents’ various interests in intervening and thus controling, if only partially, scientific research.??? ????????? 2008??? ??????(?????????????????????)???????????? ????????????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????(NRF-2008-361-A00005). ??? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????????. ????????? ??????????????? ??? ?????? ????????? ??? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????????