Remarks on the Influencing Relationship between Mulmyeonggo(?????????) and Jaemulbo(?????????) from the Standpoint of Lexicography

????????? ?????????????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????(macro-structure)??? ????????? ??????. ?????? ????????? ???1??? ???2??? ???????????????, ???3??? ???4??? ???????????????, ???5??? ?????????????????? ?????????????????? 4?????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????. ?????????????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????? ??????. ????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ??????, ????????? ?????????????????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ????????? ??????. ?????????????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ?????????????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????????. ????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????. ????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? [±animal]??? [±active]??? ????????????(semantic feature) ????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????.?????? ?????? ????????????????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??? ??????. ?????????????????? ?????? ?????? ‘??????, ??????, ????’ ???????????????????????? ????????? ????????????. ?????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????????(1596)??????. ???????????????????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????,?????????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ??????. ????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????????????????? ??? ????????????.??????????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????. ??? ?????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ??????. ???????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????? ??????. ??? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ?????????, ?????????????????? ????????? ?????????????????????????????? ????????? ???????????????. ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ????????????????????? ??? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????????. ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????????. ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????????.It is necessary to keep in mind that Mulmyeonggo(?????????) had a distinctive macro-structure in contrasts with any traditional vocabulries. The format of this book was comprised of four styles’ major classes; [+animal], [-animal] and [+active], [-active] chapters. The semantic scope of the major classes that Mulmyeonggo(?????????) owned doesn’t agree with the semantic scope of Jaemulbo(?????????). Accordingly, the result clearly shows that Jaemulbo(?????????) did not influence Mulmyeonggo(?????????) from the point of the format of major classes. On the orther hand, it is inevitable that the influencing relationship between Mulmyeonggo(?????????) and Jaemulbo(?????????) exists in comparison with the format of detail classes. The detail classes as the ‘birds’ class, ‘beasts’ class, ‘reptile’ class appear in the detail classes of Mulmyeonggo(?????????). Their classes appear in Jaemulbo(?????????) also. Of course, the origin of this influencing relationship was Bonchogangmok(????????????) that had been made in China. It follows from what has been said thus far that the tendency of their influencing relationship is pronounced in the micro-structure of the lexicography. The problem which we have to consider next is how the lemma and the annotation appear in the micro-structure of the lexicographical viewpoints. The Sino-Korean lemmas that massed between Mulmyeonggo(?????????) and Jaemulbo(?????????) at the same time, were quite a lot. The same thing may be said of the annotational processes. On the orther hand, under normal circumstances the annotational processes of Mulmyeonggo(?????????) were more simpler than the annotational processes of Jaemulbo(?????????). Rarely the annotational processes of Mulmyeonggo(?????????) were more complexer than the annotational processes of Jaemulbo(?????????). In the pretty rare cases, the annotational processes of Mulmyeonggo(?????????) were self-deployment.??? ?????? 2013?????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ???????????????(HY-2013-G)