??????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??????: ???????????? ???????????? ????????????

??? ????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????????. ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????????. ???????????? ???????????? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ??? ????????? ????????? ??????, ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????????????. ???????????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????(62.5%)??? ????????? ??????(37.5%)?????? ????????????, ?????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? 39.5%??? ?????? ?????? ????????????. ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????? ??????(3.58)??? ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????????(3.57), ????????????(3.42), ????????????(3.26), ?????????(3.25) ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????????. ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??? ????????? ????????????(3.05)??? ?????? ?????????(2.93) ?????? ??????????????? ????????????. ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? 54.6%??? ???????????? ?????????, ???????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ????????? 57.9%??? ???????????? ????????? ????????????. ??????, ?????? ??????????????? 1~3?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????, 4??? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ????????????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ????????????. ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????????????????. ??? ?????? ????????????, ?????? ?????????, ????????????, ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????????.This study aims to analyze the effects of tearing down a wall under the wall removalproject targeting the detached housing area on the prevention of crime. The studyinvestigated easiness of crime or such according to the surroundings that burglars considerbefore committing a crime, conditions they put emphasis on, or the presence or absence of awall. According to the analysis results, as for criminal intent, chance crimes (62.5%) weremore than planned crimes (37.5%) was found to be the most important one. Among thesurroundings they consider for crime, facilities for crime prevention (3.58) were regarded tobe the most important, and the next were easiness of escape (3.57), the guard post (3.42),distance of escape (3.26), and objects hidden (3.25) in order. As for the easiness of crimeaccording to the presence or absence of a wall, 54.6% preferred the detached houses with thewall, and about alleys, 57.9% preferred the alleys with a wall. Moreover, regarding theircriminal career, those that have committed a crime 1 to 3 times prefer the place with a wallwhile professional burglars having committed crimes over four times hardly acre about thewall. About their criminal intent, for planned crimes, they prefer the place with a wall, andfor chance crimes, the hardly care about it. We also studied if the characteristics of theprisoners and the degree of consideration of the surrounding environment influenced thejudgement of the ease of crime according to the existence of walls. The results showed thatmotives of the crime, escape distance, and existence of cover has a positive influence