Community interventions in construction health and safety and the implications: Evidence from Nigeria

Purpose: The reported study examined the involvement of communities— geographical or geopolitical units, which identifies culture, interest, and ethnicity—in construction health and safety (H&S) and the implications. This stems from the unexamined, hence poorly understood roles of many stakeholders in the construction H&S management and regulatory regime in Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach: Interviews with contractors and key informants, and a survey of contractors were conducted. Descriptive and inferential statistics, and thematic analysis were employed. Findings: There is evidence of community interventions: negotiating with contractors on H&S issues; strongly stipulating that H&S measures are adopted and implemented; enforcing H&S through both violent and non-violent means. These have no legal backing. There is a relationship between the locations of the projects, Urban Area and Rural Area, and six community intervention variables. The study also reveals that among the implications of community interventions in H&S are contractors contextualising H&S in these communities and tension between parties in construction projects. Again, there is a relationship between the location of the projects, and six of the implications including tension between communities and contractors and between contractors and clients. Practical implications: In adequately addressing construction safety, health and environment issues in Nigeria, geographic location and socio-cultural consideration are pertinent, a point for policymakers, communities and contractors. Originality/value: The study draws attention to the geographic location and socio-cultural explanations for the differences in H&S management, performance and attitudes of contractors in Nigeria. This is the first study that examines the involvement of communities in H&S and the implications