Add to ORKGA golden rule argument is an attempt to persuade jurors to put themselves in the place of the victim or the injured person and deliver the verdict that they would wish to receive if they were in that person\u27s position. Generally judges frown upon this type of argument, because jurors are supposed to consider the facts of a case in an objective manner.https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/portrait/1096/thumbnail.jp
황금률은 보편적인 도덕원리로 적절하지 않다는 비판에 직면하여 황금률의 도덕적인 지위를 구하고자 하는 노력의 과정에서 황금률은 적지 않은 변화를 겪었고 그 과정에서 수정된 현대의 황...
A recent study of death penalty cases has revealed that judges, who are ordinarily thought of as the...
Rules excluding various kinds of evidence from criminal trials play a prominent role in criminal pro...
A golden rule argument is an attempt to persuade jurors to put themselves in the place of the victim...
This article examines “Golden Rule reasoning”—reasoning according to the principle that we should tr...
This article examines “Golden Rule reasoning” — reasoning according to the principle that we should ...
On February 15, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Caudle v. District o...
The Golden Rule, most commonly expressed in the form "do to others what you would have them do to yo...
Much of what we tell ourselves about the Rules of Evidence—that they serve as an all-seeing gatekeep...
A central assumption of modern evidence law is that its rules are rules of admissibility only. That ...
This paper deals with the Golden Rules of Advocacy which have to be observed when ‘persuading’ a cou...
The law of closing arguments in criminal cases has proven to be a minefield for prosecutors and judg...
The rule that a juror cannot impeach his own verdict has been applied inconsistently by the courts. ...
Trying criminal cases is hard. The problem faced by a judge in court can be phrased in a deceptively...
Prosecutorial misconduct in closing argument during the penalty phase of capital trials can be defin...
황금률은 보편적인 도덕원리로 적절하지 않다는 비판에 직면하여 황금률의 도덕적인 지위를 구하고자 하는 노력의 과정에서 황금률은 적지 않은 변화를 겪었고 그 과정에서 수정된 현대의 황...
A recent study of death penalty cases has revealed that judges, who are ordinarily thought of as the...
Rules excluding various kinds of evidence from criminal trials play a prominent role in criminal pro...
A golden rule argument is an attempt to persuade jurors to put themselves in the place of the victim...
This article examines “Golden Rule reasoning”—reasoning according to the principle that we should tr...
This article examines “Golden Rule reasoning” — reasoning according to the principle that we should ...
On February 15, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Caudle v. District o...
The Golden Rule, most commonly expressed in the form "do to others what you would have them do to yo...
Much of what we tell ourselves about the Rules of Evidence—that they serve as an all-seeing gatekeep...
A central assumption of modern evidence law is that its rules are rules of admissibility only. That ...
This paper deals with the Golden Rules of Advocacy which have to be observed when ‘persuading’ a cou...
The law of closing arguments in criminal cases has proven to be a minefield for prosecutors and judg...
The rule that a juror cannot impeach his own verdict has been applied inconsistently by the courts. ...
Trying criminal cases is hard. The problem faced by a judge in court can be phrased in a deceptively...
Prosecutorial misconduct in closing argument during the penalty phase of capital trials can be defin...
황금률은 보편적인 도덕원리로 적절하지 않다는 비판에 직면하여 황금률의 도덕적인 지위를 구하고자 하는 노력의 과정에서 황금률은 적지 않은 변화를 겪었고 그 과정에서 수정된 현대의 황...
A recent study of death penalty cases has revealed that judges, who are ordinarily thought of as the...
Rules excluding various kinds of evidence from criminal trials play a prominent role in criminal pro...