Analisis Konflik Sengketa Lahan Tabanio, Kabupaten Tanah Laut, Kalimantan Selatan Menuju Pengguna Lahan Berbasis Masyarakat

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konflik sengketa lahan yang terjadi antara masyarakat, PT Kintap Jaya Wattindo dan Pemda setempat, dan bagaimana menciptakan pengguna lahan berbasis masyarakat. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian studi kasus. Penelitian ini akan mengupas serangkaian kasus dan menjadikannya analisis untuk mencapai suatu penyelesaian sengketa lahan berbasis masyarakat dan pengguna lahan yang kohesif, arif dan berkelanjutan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah, kondisi pre-konflik lahan Tabanio, konflik lintas batas, dan upaya resolusi konflik lahan Tabanio. Dalam kasus sengketa lahan Tabanio, lembaga sosial dan aturan lokal ikut berperan penting dalam melindungi lahan atas nama masyarakat Tabanio. Hal ini juga mendapat dukungan dan komitmen penuh dari masyarakat Tabanio untuk mengelola lahan tersebut berdasarkan kearifan lokal. Lembaga sosial yang dimaksud dapat berbentuk kekerabatan sosial, identitas kolektif, timbal Balik simbolik, tanggung jawab sosial, dan kepekaan ekologi. Selain itu, kearifan lokal juga mengatur bahwa lahan tidak dapat diakses secara gratis untuk kepentingan komersialisasi dan komodifikasi. Kata Kunci : Sengketa lahan Tabanio, PT Kintap Jaya Wattindo, Pemda Tanah Laut, Ekologi Politik, Kearifan LokalThis aimed of this research into analyze conflict land disputes that occur between people, PT Kintap Jaya Wattindo and local government, and how to create This study aimed to analyze conflict land disputes that occur between people, PT Kintap Jaya Wattindo and local government, and how to create community-based land users. The method used is descriptive qualitative case study. This research will discuss a series of cases and making analyzes to achieve a community-based dispute settlement land and land users cohesive, sensible and sustainable. Results of this research is, pre-conflict conditions Tabanio land, cross-border conflicts, and conflict resolution efforts Tabanio land. Political ecology emerged as an alternative perspective in managing natural resources to build synergy between nature and human relationships through local knowledge. In Tabanio, social institutions and local rules came into play and the people committed to protect the mangroves on behalf of the community. These social institutions took the form of kinship ties, collective identity, symbolic reciprocity, social responsibility, and ecological sensibility. The mangroves were not free access, but governed by formal and informal rules to maintain its benefits for the good of the community. The community, through the elders, determined the access and made decisions about management on behalf of them all. Community members acted in a way that benefited the overall good even when they were avowing individual rights. Individuals evolved behaviors that were commensurate with their responsibilities, leading to innovative power structures that were locally sensitive and environmentally appropriate. Key Word : Land dispute Tabanio,PT Kintap Jaya Wattindo, Tanah Laut Regency, Political Ecology, Local wisdom DAFTAR PUSTAKA Ali, Achmad. 1996.Menguak Tabir Hukum (suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis) , Chandra Pratama, Jakarta Beni Hario (2013) Analisis penggunaan Tanah Menurut UU No 51/Perpu/1960. Lex Administratum Vol.1/No.2/Apr-Jun/2013 Davis. (1997) Konflik Pertanahan , Jakarta: Galia Indonesia Dian Cahyaningrum (2012) “Persoalan Hukum Konflik Lahan” INFO Singkat hukum Vol.IV No.01/P3DI/Januari/2012. Endaryanta, Erwin. Politik Air di Indonesia : Penjarahan Si Gedhang oleh Korporasi Aqua- Danone.Yogyakarta: JPP UGM, 2007 Hardin, Garret. “The Tragedy of the Commons”. Science. Vol. 162. No. 3859 (1968). hlm1243-1248. Jati, W.R. 20 April 2011. Pembangunan Gerus Kearifan Lokal. Kompas, hlm.6. Mudjiono, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Di Indonesia melalui Revitalisasi Fungsi Badan Peradilan”,Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 14 No. 3, 14 Juli 2007, Yogyakarta: FH UII, hlm. 464. Mustain, 2007, Petani vs Negara : Gerakan Sosial Petani Melawan Hegemoni Negara , AR-Yogyakarta, Ruzz Media Novri Susan, M.A.2010. Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik Dan Isu-isu Konflik Kontemporer.Jakarta : Kencana. Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. California: Sage Publisher Pruitt G. Dean dan Jeffrey Z. Rubbin. 2004. Teori Konflik Sosial, Seri Psikologi Sosial, Cetakan Kelima, Alih Bahasa Helly P. Soetjipto dan Sri Mulyantini, PustakaPelajar, Jakarta. Shiva, Vandhana. “Globalism, Biodiversity, and The Third World”.Helena Norberg-Hodge (ed.).The Future of Progress : Reflections on Environment and Development. Devon: Green Books, 1995. Subarsono. (2005). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Sugiyono. 2001. Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Alfabeta, Bandung. Tompkins.”The Political Economy of Cross-Scale Networks in Resource Co-Management”. Ecology and Society.Vol.10. No.2 (2005). hlm. 1-14. Urip santoso, 2005 “Hukum agrarian dan hak-hak atas tanah” , Prenanda Media, Jakarta Wirawan. 2010. Konflik dan Manajemen Konflik (Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika