Comunicação e Intencionalidade: Possibilidades da Comunicação Intencional como Experiência da Exterioridade

How can we communicate intentions? What one means when one uses a certain expression about his inner states, like “I have a pain”? What “understand someone” means? These are some of many others questions that we have to underline when we pretend analyse the importance of normal and ordinary linguistic productions. Questions that help us to understand the use, production and functionalism of ordinary language. However, there are others communication manners, like intra-personal communication processes? The main focus of this paper is about the proficiency and use of ordinary language. Thus, this paper intends to present a theoretical analysis between language, inner states (thought, sensation, perception, feeling, etc.) and reality. Trilogy as a complex system organizing experiences into meaningful structures, considering some issues: i) language of thought (or intra-communication); ii) semantic inter-subjectivity; iii) inter-translated languages to explore the interactive conception; iv) mental and linguistic construction of reality; v) conceptual pathologies of language; and vi) expressive act of meaning. In this paper, the basic approach embraces the analysis of a simple semiotic concept, is that of meaning, considering the language’s difficulties and proficiencies to represent (describe or express) the world (as individual mental construction). It seems to me obvious that a great many of the things that we say (and understand from what is said) we say (and understand) because we learn them in conversation with others, in which it is the intention of the interlocutors to inform of something. Based on Grice’s work, i shall argue that it is also important what isn’t said when it is said, beyond what is said when it is not said.