This article examines Keith Lehrer's distinction between belief and acceptance and how it differs from other accounts of belief and of the family of doxastic attitudes. I sketch a different taxonomy of doxastic attitudes. Lehrer's notion of acceptance is mostly epistemic and at the service of his account of the "loop of reason”, whereas for other writers acceptance is mostly a pragmatic attitude. I argue, however, that his account of acceptance underdetermines the role that the attitude of trust plays in his analysis of reaso
This paper argues for a methodological point that bears on a relatively long-standing debate concern...
Most philosophical discussion of trust focuses on the three-place trust predicate: X trusting Y to φ...
I aim to do four things in this paper: sketch a conception of belief, apply epistemic norms to it in...
In the literature on doxastic attitudes, the notion ‘belief’ is used in both a coarse-grained and a ...
This dissertation contains a philosophical project and a psychological project. Together, they explo...
The present article addresses the question of the ‘roots’ of trust: a debate between cognitive and n...
Belief is not a unified phenomenon. In this paper I argue, as a number of other riters argue, that o...
What kind of mental state is trust? It seems to have features that can lead one to think that it is ...
ABelief is not a unified phenomenon. In this paper I argue, as a number of other writers argue, that...
Some events in our lives are things that we do, what philosophers call exercises of agency. Other ev...
The study of belief and its norms of rationality is central to contemporary epistemology. But belief...
an epistemic peer?1 These discussions have assumed that the question of the proper response to disag...
In this paper, I argue that the relationship between belief and credence is a central question in ep...
This dissertation consists in a defence of the claim that belief is a state on which its bearer can ...
There are currently two robust traditions in philosophy dealing with doxastic attitudes: the traditi...
This paper argues for a methodological point that bears on a relatively long-standing debate concern...
Most philosophical discussion of trust focuses on the three-place trust predicate: X trusting Y to φ...
I aim to do four things in this paper: sketch a conception of belief, apply epistemic norms to it in...
In the literature on doxastic attitudes, the notion ‘belief’ is used in both a coarse-grained and a ...
This dissertation contains a philosophical project and a psychological project. Together, they explo...
The present article addresses the question of the ‘roots’ of trust: a debate between cognitive and n...
Belief is not a unified phenomenon. In this paper I argue, as a number of other riters argue, that o...
What kind of mental state is trust? It seems to have features that can lead one to think that it is ...
ABelief is not a unified phenomenon. In this paper I argue, as a number of other writers argue, that...
Some events in our lives are things that we do, what philosophers call exercises of agency. Other ev...
The study of belief and its norms of rationality is central to contemporary epistemology. But belief...
an epistemic peer?1 These discussions have assumed that the question of the proper response to disag...
In this paper, I argue that the relationship between belief and credence is a central question in ep...
This dissertation consists in a defence of the claim that belief is a state on which its bearer can ...
There are currently two robust traditions in philosophy dealing with doxastic attitudes: the traditi...
This paper argues for a methodological point that bears on a relatively long-standing debate concern...
Most philosophical discussion of trust focuses on the three-place trust predicate: X trusting Y to φ...
I aim to do four things in this paper: sketch a conception of belief, apply epistemic norms to it in...