This article identifies problems with regard to providing criteria that regulate the matching of logical formulae and natural language. We then take on to solve these problems by defining a necessary and sufficient criterion of adequate formalization. On the basis of this criterion we argue that logic should not be seen as an ars iudicandi capable of evaluating the validity or invalidity of informal arguments, but as an ars explicandi that renders transparent the formal structure of informal reasonin
In his new book, Logical Form, Andrea Iacona distinguishes between two different roles that have bee...
Legal formalism is the foil for many theories of law. Yet formalism remains controversial, meaning t...
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the...
Abstract. This article identifies problems with regard to providing criteria that regulate the match...
This paper compares several models of formalization. It articulates criteria of correct formalizatio...
Formalizations in first-order logic are standardly used to represent logical forms of sentences and ...
There is a long-standing debate whether propositions, sentences, statements or utterances provide an...
Abstract: I defend a conception of Logic as normative for the sort of activities in which inferences...
The goal of this thesis is to defend and explain the claim that traditional logical analysis is not ...
The traditional approach to Natural Language Semantics consists in equating the semantic content of ...
In this paper we investigate the extent to which formal argumentation models can handle ten basic ch...
In order to decide whether a discursive product of human reason corresponds or not to the logical or...
Dealing with deductive reasoning, performed by ‘real-life’ reasoners and expressed in natural langua...
Given the large variety of existing logical formalisms it is of utmost importance to select the most...
This paper presents a way in which formal logic can be understood and reformulated in terms of argum...
In his new book, Logical Form, Andrea Iacona distinguishes between two different roles that have bee...
Legal formalism is the foil for many theories of law. Yet formalism remains controversial, meaning t...
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the...
Abstract. This article identifies problems with regard to providing criteria that regulate the match...
This paper compares several models of formalization. It articulates criteria of correct formalizatio...
Formalizations in first-order logic are standardly used to represent logical forms of sentences and ...
There is a long-standing debate whether propositions, sentences, statements or utterances provide an...
Abstract: I defend a conception of Logic as normative for the sort of activities in which inferences...
The goal of this thesis is to defend and explain the claim that traditional logical analysis is not ...
The traditional approach to Natural Language Semantics consists in equating the semantic content of ...
In this paper we investigate the extent to which formal argumentation models can handle ten basic ch...
In order to decide whether a discursive product of human reason corresponds or not to the logical or...
Dealing with deductive reasoning, performed by ‘real-life’ reasoners and expressed in natural langua...
Given the large variety of existing logical formalisms it is of utmost importance to select the most...
This paper presents a way in which formal logic can be understood and reformulated in terms of argum...
In his new book, Logical Form, Andrea Iacona distinguishes between two different roles that have bee...
Legal formalism is the foil for many theories of law. Yet formalism remains controversial, meaning t...
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the...