In the grant peer review process we can distinguish various evaluation stages in which assessors judge applications on a rating scale. Bornmann & al. [2008] show that latent Markov models offer a fundamentally good opportunity to model statistically peer review processes. The main objective of this short communication is to test the influence of the applicants' gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models. We found differences in transition probabilities from one stage to the other for applications for a doctoral fellowship submitted by male and female applicant
Abstract only availableTraditionally, the assessment of student work has been the primary responsibi...
Summary: In science, peer review is the best-established method of assessing manuscripts for publica...
This study examines a basic assumption of peer review, namely, the idea that there is a consen- sus ...
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is widely...
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is widely...
Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential biases, ...
One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the peer review process is gender bias. In this stud...
OBJECTIVES To examine whether the gender of applicants and peer reviewers and other factors influ...
Research councils claim to select excellent grant proposals in order to advance science. At the same...
Published online 18 October 2021Previous studies have found little or no systematic differences in t...
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been critic...
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been critic...
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been critic...
Does past performance influence success in grant applications? We tested whether the decisions of th...
Does past performance influence success in grant applications? We tested whether the decisions of th...
Abstract only availableTraditionally, the assessment of student work has been the primary responsibi...
Summary: In science, peer review is the best-established method of assessing manuscripts for publica...
This study examines a basic assumption of peer review, namely, the idea that there is a consen- sus ...
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is widely...
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is widely...
Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential biases, ...
One of the most frequently voiced criticisms of the peer review process is gender bias. In this stud...
OBJECTIVES To examine whether the gender of applicants and peer reviewers and other factors influ...
Research councils claim to select excellent grant proposals in order to advance science. At the same...
Published online 18 October 2021Previous studies have found little or no systematic differences in t...
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been critic...
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been critic...
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been critic...
Does past performance influence success in grant applications? We tested whether the decisions of th...
Does past performance influence success in grant applications? We tested whether the decisions of th...
Abstract only availableTraditionally, the assessment of student work has been the primary responsibi...
Summary: In science, peer review is the best-established method of assessing manuscripts for publica...
This study examines a basic assumption of peer review, namely, the idea that there is a consen- sus ...