Hart & Moore (1999) construct a model to show that contracts perform poorly in complex environments when the state of the world is unverifiable and renegotiation cannot be ruled out. They implicitly assume one player can extort payment from another by threatening to take an inefficient action which hurts both of them. We show that without this assumption a simple "buyer option" contract can implement the first-best even as complexity becomes severe
This paper develops a theoretical framework for studying contract and enforcement in setting of comp...
Even with complete information, two-person bargaining can generate a large number of equilibria, inv...
This paper presents analysis of contractual settings with complete but unverifiable information and ...
“Buyer option ” contracts, in which the buyer selects the product variant to be traded and chooses w...
“Buyer option” contracts, in which the buyer selects the product variant to be traded and chooses wh...
The paper studies a general model of hold-up in a setting encompassing the models of Segal (1999) an...
Two parties may agree to a mutually binding contract that will govern their behavior after an uncert...
This paper studies moral hazard contracts that may be renegotiated after an agent chooses an unobser...
In a recent article, Lyon and Rasmusen (2004) argue that buyer-option contracts are more effective a...
Jovanovic and Ueda (1997) consider a principal-agent model with moral hazard and renegotiation. A no...
It is well known that contract incompleteness can arise from the impossibility of planning for all f...
In the contract-theoretic literature, there is a vital debate about whether contracts can mitigate t...
It has been emphasized that when contracts are incomplete (e.g., because some relevant variables are...
We identify the inefficiencies that arise when negotiation between two parties takes place in the pr...
We study a contract design setting in which the contracting parties cannot commit not to renegotiate...
This paper develops a theoretical framework for studying contract and enforcement in setting of comp...
Even with complete information, two-person bargaining can generate a large number of equilibria, inv...
This paper presents analysis of contractual settings with complete but unverifiable information and ...
“Buyer option ” contracts, in which the buyer selects the product variant to be traded and chooses w...
“Buyer option” contracts, in which the buyer selects the product variant to be traded and chooses wh...
The paper studies a general model of hold-up in a setting encompassing the models of Segal (1999) an...
Two parties may agree to a mutually binding contract that will govern their behavior after an uncert...
This paper studies moral hazard contracts that may be renegotiated after an agent chooses an unobser...
In a recent article, Lyon and Rasmusen (2004) argue that buyer-option contracts are more effective a...
Jovanovic and Ueda (1997) consider a principal-agent model with moral hazard and renegotiation. A no...
It is well known that contract incompleteness can arise from the impossibility of planning for all f...
In the contract-theoretic literature, there is a vital debate about whether contracts can mitigate t...
It has been emphasized that when contracts are incomplete (e.g., because some relevant variables are...
We identify the inefficiencies that arise when negotiation between two parties takes place in the pr...
We study a contract design setting in which the contracting parties cannot commit not to renegotiate...
This paper develops a theoretical framework for studying contract and enforcement in setting of comp...
Even with complete information, two-person bargaining can generate a large number of equilibria, inv...
This paper presents analysis of contractual settings with complete but unverifiable information and ...