In our original paper, we estimated the maximum field of view (FOV) that would result when collecting luminescence over a cone half-angle u and coupling this into a spectrograph with a given f /number and a slit width d. Due to the use of the low-angle approximation outwith the paraxial regime, the expression given in Equation 2 used the tangent of the angle rather than the correct sine function
This article was originally published online on 20 February 2019. Due to a production error, in the ...
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69985/2/JAPIAU-77-3-1331-1.pd
After the publication of our manuscript (Honkanen et al., 2014), we have learned of the presence of ...
Correction to: Nature Communications; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06838-2 TUprints-DOI: http...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69682/2/APPLAB-63-1-121-1.pd
In the original paper, a calibration error exists in the image-formation model used to analyze exper...
The following corrections should be made to the original article: • P. 357, in the eqs. (17), (18) t...
We report a combined theoretical/experimental study of dynamic screening of excitons in media with f...
Performing a systematic review of our experimental data, we have realized that we introduced a signi...
The authors regret that the Acknowledgements section was incomplete in this article. The correct Ack...
In the calculation of the reflection coefficient for the partial reflection of an electromagnetic wa...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary Figure S8 of the Supplementary Materia...
There is an error with the unit of measurements for energy in the text. Throughout the whole paper, ...
International audienceThis paper [J. Nanophoton. 8(1), 083097 (2014)] was published on 6 January 201...
This article was originally published online on 20 February 2019. Due to a production error, in the ...
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69985/2/JAPIAU-77-3-1331-1.pd
After the publication of our manuscript (Honkanen et al., 2014), we have learned of the presence of ...
Correction to: Nature Communications; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06838-2 TUprints-DOI: http...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69682/2/APPLAB-63-1-121-1.pd
In the original paper, a calibration error exists in the image-formation model used to analyze exper...
The following corrections should be made to the original article: • P. 357, in the eqs. (17), (18) t...
We report a combined theoretical/experimental study of dynamic screening of excitons in media with f...
Performing a systematic review of our experimental data, we have realized that we introduced a signi...
The authors regret that the Acknowledgements section was incomplete in this article. The correct Ack...
In the calculation of the reflection coefficient for the partial reflection of an electromagnetic wa...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary Figure S8 of the Supplementary Materia...
There is an error with the unit of measurements for energy in the text. Throughout the whole paper, ...
International audienceThis paper [J. Nanophoton. 8(1), 083097 (2014)] was published on 6 January 201...
This article was originally published online on 20 February 2019. Due to a production error, in the ...
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69985/2/JAPIAU-77-3-1331-1.pd