This paper focuses on how the personal epistemologies of scientists and science communicators shape their practices and interact with one another in the construction of popular science news. I present data from observations and interviews with scientists and reporters as they work together to produce science news to show how competing epistemologies result in compromises that—when presented to the public—might lead readers to form understandings that are at odds with disciplinary knowledge
Although studies on science popularization in recent decades have emphasized its difference from oth...
Scientific discourse produced by and for specialists reaches, by means of science popularization (SP...
This paper proposes a heuristic of ethos indicators that could be used to shed light on how embedded...
This paper focuses on how the personal epistemologies of scientists and science communicators shape ...
Science studies have long been concerned with the complex interrelationship between scienti?c resear...
This study examines the conflation of terms such as “knowledge” and “understanding” in peer-reviewed...
This Editorial summarizes the papers in a Frontiers in Communication Research Topic that looks at sc...
This dissertation describes an ethnographic study of how science journalists understand and use cred...
This article critiques the `dominant view' of the popularization of science that takes it as a one-w...
This Chapter looks at popularization through the press focusing on the drafting of the popularizing ...
Epistemology is a central issue in journalism research. Journalism is among the most influential kno...
Scientific curation, where scientific evidence is selected and shared, is essential to public belief...
The article includes a discussion of two models which describe contemporary communication processes ...
Although uncertainty is inherent in scientific research, it is an often neglected topic in public co...
This dissertation focuses on various aspects of the issue of public understanding of science, especi...
Although studies on science popularization in recent decades have emphasized its difference from oth...
Scientific discourse produced by and for specialists reaches, by means of science popularization (SP...
This paper proposes a heuristic of ethos indicators that could be used to shed light on how embedded...
This paper focuses on how the personal epistemologies of scientists and science communicators shape ...
Science studies have long been concerned with the complex interrelationship between scienti?c resear...
This study examines the conflation of terms such as “knowledge” and “understanding” in peer-reviewed...
This Editorial summarizes the papers in a Frontiers in Communication Research Topic that looks at sc...
This dissertation describes an ethnographic study of how science journalists understand and use cred...
This article critiques the `dominant view' of the popularization of science that takes it as a one-w...
This Chapter looks at popularization through the press focusing on the drafting of the popularizing ...
Epistemology is a central issue in journalism research. Journalism is among the most influential kno...
Scientific curation, where scientific evidence is selected and shared, is essential to public belief...
The article includes a discussion of two models which describe contemporary communication processes ...
Although uncertainty is inherent in scientific research, it is an often neglected topic in public co...
This dissertation focuses on various aspects of the issue of public understanding of science, especi...
Although studies on science popularization in recent decades have emphasized its difference from oth...
Scientific discourse produced by and for specialists reaches, by means of science popularization (SP...
This paper proposes a heuristic of ethos indicators that could be used to shed light on how embedded...