Tracing Multimetal Craftsmanship through Metallurgical debris : Open air workshops and multimetality in Late Iron Age Scandinavia

Metallurgical debris is by far the most informative source material for studying the metal craftsmanship ofthe past. In comparison to the finished objects, which has attracted far more attention in archaeologicalresearch, debris material are more or less confined to the original workshop sites and hence provide directevidence as to production volume and quality, site organization, artisanal skill and operational sequenceswithin the various crafts.On many sites throughout the “Metal Ages” evidence of both iron smithing and the use of non-ferrousmetals can be found. Traditionally, a clear division between these types of crafts has been enforced in siteinterpretation, separating sites into ferrous versus non-ferrous workshop sites chronologically or spatially.However, the presence of, for instance, smithing slag cakes with droplets of Cu-alloy within their matrix aswell as casting debris of both metals and ceramic materials in forges and smithing hearths challenges thisstrict division.The thesis project “From Crucible and onto Anvil” started in 2015 and focuses on sites housing remains ofmultimetal craftsmanship dating primarily from 500-1000 AD. Within the project a comprehensive surveyof sites will be used to evaluate the presence of multimetal craftsmanship in the landscape based first andforemost on the metallurgical debris documented on or collected from them. Sites in selected target areaswill be subject to intra-site analysis of their metallurgical remains focusing on workshop organisation, thearray of metalworking techniques utilized and the chronological variances of multimetal craftsmanship.A primary aim in the project is to elucidate the conceptual aspects of complex metalworking. The termmultimetality is used to analytically frame all the societal and cosmological aspects of metal craftsmanship.Through this inclusive perspective both the metal craftsmanship and the metalworkers behind it arepositioned within the overall socioeconomic framework. The metalworkers, their skills and competences aswell as the products of their labour are viewed as dynamic actors in the landscape and on the arenas ofpolitical economy of the Late Iron Age.This paper aims to present a few examples of the surveyed multimetal sites, discuss workshopreconstruction through metallurgical debris and present preliminary interpretations of the sites internalorganisation and placement within the cultural landscape. Many of the sites surveyed so far are interpretedas open air workshops with a relatively long continuity ranging several generations of metalworkers. Howis this to be interpreted? Where the multimetal craftsmanship undertaken of temporary character? And if so,why did the metalworkers continue to use the same workshop site for generations?The concept of multimetality and the possibilities to capture this elusive, yet crucial, element of metalcraftsmanship through the study of metallurgical debris will also be discussed in the paper. The surveyedsites and the reconstruction of their internal workshop organisation will serves as examples of howmultimetality was manifested on the sites and in the landscape