Ženske zgodbe v slovenskem časopisju od Republike do One

Magistrsko delo obravnava literarne natečaje za žensko zgodbo, ki so potekali v časopisu Republika, reviji Jana in Delovi prilogi Ona. V teoretičnem delu naloge sta predstavljena ženska pisava ter zgodovinski pregled literarnega ustvarjanja žensk na tujem in pri nas. Sledi pregled natečajev za ženske zgodbe v časopisju, ki skozi obdobja pokaže, kakšen je bil njihov prehod v knjižno obliko in kako se je spreminjala sama zamisel natečaja. S pomočjo raziskave v vzajemni bazi podatkov COBIB smo poskušali ugotoviti, ali so zgodnji natečaji uveljavili več udeleženk kakor tisti, ki so kasneje potekali pri Oni. Primerjava števila objav udeleženk je omenjeno tezo potrdila. Razloge za to smo našli v večjem vplivu literarne tradicije na zgodnje natečaje na eni strani in v popularizaciji Oninih natečajev na drugi. Primerjava rezultatov je razkrila dolgoročne posledice izbiranja nagrajenk s strani literarnih strokovnjakov in, nasprotno, izbiranja z glasovanjem bralk.This Master\u27s thesis considers literary competitions for best women\u27s stories held by the Republika newspaper, the Jana magazine, and the Ona supplement. The theoretical part of the thesis looks at women\u27s writing in general and provides a historical overview of literary creation by women in Slovenia and abroad. This is followed by a review of literary competitions for women in Slovene periodicals, which shows how they transitioned into book form and how the idea of the competition itself changed with time. Conducting research using the union bibliographic/catalogue database COBIB, we aimed to determine whether early competitions established more participants than competitions organised by Ona later on. A comparison of the publication numbers of participants confirmed this hypothesis, reasons being a bigger influence of literary tradition on early competitions on the one hand, and the popularisation of Ona\u27s competitions on the other. A comparison of results revealed the long-term effects of choosing winners by way of literary critics and, contrariwise, by means of reader voting