According to the no miracles argument, scientific realism provides the only satisfactory explanation of the predictive success of science. It is argued in the present article that a different explanatory strategy, based on the posit of strong limitations to the underdetermination of scientific theory building by the available empirical data, offers a more convincing understanding of scientific success
Laudan (1984) distinguishes between two senses of success for scientific theories: (i) that a partic...
The dispute between scientific realism and anti-realism is one of the most exciting topics in the cu...
The dispute between scientific realism and anti-realism is one of the most exciting topics in the cu...
According to the no miracles argument, scientific realism provides the only satisfactory explanation...
According to the no miracles argument, scientific realism provides the only satisfactory explanation...
According to the no miracles argument, scientific realism provides the only satisfactory explanation...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories ...
This paper delves into the debate between scientific realism and anti-realism concerning the success...
Laudan (1984) distinguishes between two senses of success for scientific theories: (i) that a partic...
The dispute between scientific realism and anti-realism is one of the most exciting topics in the cu...
The dispute between scientific realism and anti-realism is one of the most exciting topics in the cu...
According to the no miracles argument, scientific realism provides the only satisfactory explanation...
According to the no miracles argument, scientific realism provides the only satisfactory explanation...
According to the no miracles argument, scientific realism provides the only satisfactory explanation...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam, 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories...
The no-miracles argument (Putnam 1975) holds that science is successful because successful theories ...
This paper delves into the debate between scientific realism and anti-realism concerning the success...
Laudan (1984) distinguishes between two senses of success for scientific theories: (i) that a partic...
The dispute between scientific realism and anti-realism is one of the most exciting topics in the cu...
The dispute between scientific realism and anti-realism is one of the most exciting topics in the cu...