Add to ORKGThis paper argues that standard theories of judgment aggregation cannot apply to scientific practice, since science is a temporally extended process that involves both different individuals and different hypotheses during that process. Thus, for example, we seem to have no idea how to determine the judgments of dead scientists about theoretical alternatives that were proposed after their death. The paper then proposes an algorithm for judgment aggregation to try to address some of these challenges
The fragmentation of academic disciplines forces individuals to specialise. In doing so, they become...
Decision making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know the causal effe...
We restate the problem of judgment aggregation and approach it using the decision-theoretic framewor...
This paper argues that standard theories of judgment aggregation cannot apply to scientific practice...
The endeavor to apply the theory of judgment aggregation (TJA) to scientific practice has two main ...
This paper raises the problem of judgment aggregation in science. The problem has two sides. First, ...
This paper addresses the problem of judgment aggregation in science. How should scientists decide wh...
The aggregation of consistent individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a c...
The aggregation of consistent individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a c...
Decision making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know both the causal...
A necessary condition for a group being taken as a rational agent is that its choices and judgements...
International audienceJudgment aggregation is a mathematical theory of collective decision-making. I...
This paper provides an introductory review of the theory of judgment aggregation. It introduces the ...
This introduces the symposium on judgment aggregation. The theory of judgment aggregation asks how s...
In recent years, judgement aggregation has emerged as an important area of social choice theory. Jud...
The fragmentation of academic disciplines forces individuals to specialise. In doing so, they become...
Decision making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know the causal effe...
We restate the problem of judgment aggregation and approach it using the decision-theoretic framewor...
This paper argues that standard theories of judgment aggregation cannot apply to scientific practice...
The endeavor to apply the theory of judgment aggregation (TJA) to scientific practice has two main ...
This paper raises the problem of judgment aggregation in science. The problem has two sides. First, ...
This paper addresses the problem of judgment aggregation in science. How should scientists decide wh...
The aggregation of consistent individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a c...
The aggregation of consistent individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a c...
Decision making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know both the causal...
A necessary condition for a group being taken as a rational agent is that its choices and judgements...
International audienceJudgment aggregation is a mathematical theory of collective decision-making. I...
This paper provides an introductory review of the theory of judgment aggregation. It introduces the ...
This introduces the symposium on judgment aggregation. The theory of judgment aggregation asks how s...
In recent years, judgement aggregation has emerged as an important area of social choice theory. Jud...
The fragmentation of academic disciplines forces individuals to specialise. In doing so, they become...
Decision making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know the causal effe...
We restate the problem of judgment aggregation and approach it using the decision-theoretic framewor...