In the recent judgment of WBC (Local Authority) v Z, X, Y1 a twenty-year-old woman with Asperger Syndrome and a borderline learning disability was declared to possess legal capacity, both to participate in the litigation and to make decisions regarding her residence, social contacts and care. This judgment is important because it recognises a strong presumption of capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) and provides a comprehensive example of the Act’s application to a complex and finely balanced set of facts
Judges face a challenging task in determining the weight that ought to be accorded to the person’s (...
covers all decisions on personal welfare including financial matters, relating to people who tempora...
Background/objectivesMany jurisdictions use a functional model of capacity with similar legal criter...
The law’s cliff-edge approach to mental capacity denies those who lack capacity any right to determi...
The lawâs cliff-edge approach to mental capacity denies those who lack capacity any right to determi...
The lawâs cliff-edge approach to mental capacity denies those who lack capacity any right to determi...
Most jurisdictions require that a mental capacity assessment be conducted using a functional model w...
The Court of Appeal decision in PC v City of York illustrates the complexity inconsistency and limit...
‘The decision on capacity is one for the judge to make’.1 Deciding whose voices matter in the assess...
The Mental Capacity Act 2005, due for implementation in 2007, will create a new statutory framework ...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present findings from a research project which investigated...
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 sets out a ground-breaking statutory framework to empower and protect v...
This article compares the bases upon which actions are taken or decisions are made in relation to th...
It is now more than a quarter of a century since the Law Commission completed its ground-breaking re...
This paper explores the distinction between being autonomous and having capacity for the purposes of...
Judges face a challenging task in determining the weight that ought to be accorded to the person’s (...
covers all decisions on personal welfare including financial matters, relating to people who tempora...
Background/objectivesMany jurisdictions use a functional model of capacity with similar legal criter...
The law’s cliff-edge approach to mental capacity denies those who lack capacity any right to determi...
The lawâs cliff-edge approach to mental capacity denies those who lack capacity any right to determi...
The lawâs cliff-edge approach to mental capacity denies those who lack capacity any right to determi...
Most jurisdictions require that a mental capacity assessment be conducted using a functional model w...
The Court of Appeal decision in PC v City of York illustrates the complexity inconsistency and limit...
‘The decision on capacity is one for the judge to make’.1 Deciding whose voices matter in the assess...
The Mental Capacity Act 2005, due for implementation in 2007, will create a new statutory framework ...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present findings from a research project which investigated...
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 sets out a ground-breaking statutory framework to empower and protect v...
This article compares the bases upon which actions are taken or decisions are made in relation to th...
It is now more than a quarter of a century since the Law Commission completed its ground-breaking re...
This paper explores the distinction between being autonomous and having capacity for the purposes of...
Judges face a challenging task in determining the weight that ought to be accorded to the person’s (...
covers all decisions on personal welfare including financial matters, relating to people who tempora...
Background/objectivesMany jurisdictions use a functional model of capacity with similar legal criter...