Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preference order. We present a framework for argumentation where two kinds of defeat relation are present, depending on the outcome of a preference function. An argument A is a proper defeater of B, if both arguments are in conflict, and A is preferred to B according to. A is a blocking defeater of B, if they are in conflict and both arguments are incomparable or indistinguishable. We define a function to caracterize the set of accepted argument in the framework. This function also provide a method for identifying controversial situations.Eje: V - Workshop de agentes y sistemas inteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI
In classical abstract argumentation, arguments interact with each other through a single abstract no...
Argumentation is a promising approach for reasoning with uncertain or incoherent knowledge or more g...
peer reviewedConsider an argument A that is attacked by an argument B, while A is preferred to B. Ex...
We define an abstract argumentation framework that includes a binary symmetric relation representing...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
In this work we explore the inclusion of the notion of multiple argument conflicts, those in which t...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspec...
Argumentation is a reasoning model based on the construction and evaluation of arguments. Dung has p...
In this research line we are exploring the possibility of having multiple preference criteria to com...
Abstract. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict...
In this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation system...
National audienceArgumentation is a reasoning model based on the construction and evaluation of argu...
International audienceDung’s argumentation framework consists of a set of arguments and an attack re...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
In classical abstract argumentation, arguments interact with each other through a single abstract no...
Argumentation is a promising approach for reasoning with uncertain or incoherent knowledge or more g...
peer reviewedConsider an argument A that is attacked by an argument B, while A is preferred to B. Ex...
We define an abstract argumentation framework that includes a binary symmetric relation representing...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
In this work we explore the inclusion of the notion of multiple argument conflicts, those in which t...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspec...
Argumentation is a reasoning model based on the construction and evaluation of arguments. Dung has p...
In this research line we are exploring the possibility of having multiple preference criteria to com...
Abstract. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict...
In this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation system...
National audienceArgumentation is a reasoning model based on the construction and evaluation of argu...
International audienceDung’s argumentation framework consists of a set of arguments and an attack re...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
In classical abstract argumentation, arguments interact with each other through a single abstract no...
Argumentation is a promising approach for reasoning with uncertain or incoherent knowledge or more g...
peer reviewedConsider an argument A that is attacked by an argument B, while A is preferred to B. Ex...