Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument that is “fully satisfying” in a robust and integrated sense. The process of explicating the notion of fully satisfying arguments requires expanding the concept of arguers to include all of an argument’s participants, including judges, juries, and interested spectators. And that, in turn, requires expanding the concept of an argument itself to include its entire context
In this paper, I argue that, despite the progress made in recent years, virtue argumentation theory ...
Several authors have recently begun to apply virtue theory to argumentation. Critics of this program...
In a 2006 paper I claimed that the virtue arguments or inferences must have is not that they be trut...
Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument ...
ABSTRACT: Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an...
Abstract: Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an...
Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument ...
Argumentation theorists are beginning to think of ad hominem arguments as generally legitimate. Virt...
In this paper we consider the prospects for an account of good argument that takes the character of ...
In this paper we consider the prospects for an account of good argument that takes the character of ...
The incompleteness problem for virtue ethics is inherited by a virtue-based theory of argumentation ...
Virtue theories have lately enjoyed a modest vogue in the study of argumentation, echoing the succes...
Abstract. Virtue theories have become influential in ethics and epistemol-ogy. This paper argues for...
A virtue approach to argumentation would focus on the arguers’ character rather than the arguments. ...
Abstract: Virtue argumentation theory (VAT) has been charged of being incomplete, given its alleged ...
In this paper, I argue that, despite the progress made in recent years, virtue argumentation theory ...
Several authors have recently begun to apply virtue theory to argumentation. Critics of this program...
In a 2006 paper I claimed that the virtue arguments or inferences must have is not that they be trut...
Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument ...
ABSTRACT: Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an...
Abstract: Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an...
Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument ...
Argumentation theorists are beginning to think of ad hominem arguments as generally legitimate. Virt...
In this paper we consider the prospects for an account of good argument that takes the character of ...
In this paper we consider the prospects for an account of good argument that takes the character of ...
The incompleteness problem for virtue ethics is inherited by a virtue-based theory of argumentation ...
Virtue theories have lately enjoyed a modest vogue in the study of argumentation, echoing the succes...
Abstract. Virtue theories have become influential in ethics and epistemol-ogy. This paper argues for...
A virtue approach to argumentation would focus on the arguers’ character rather than the arguments. ...
Abstract: Virtue argumentation theory (VAT) has been charged of being incomplete, given its alleged ...
In this paper, I argue that, despite the progress made in recent years, virtue argumentation theory ...
Several authors have recently begun to apply virtue theory to argumentation. Critics of this program...
In a 2006 paper I claimed that the virtue arguments or inferences must have is not that they be trut...