From early modernity, philosophers have engaged in skeptical discussions concerning knowledge of the existence, state, and standing of other minds. The analogical move from self to other unfolds as controversy. This paper reposes the problem as an argumentation predicament and examines analogy as an opening to the study of rhetorical cognition. Rhetorical cognition is identified as a productive process coming to terms with an other through testing sustainable risk. The paper explains how self-sustaining risk is theorized by Aristotle’s virtue ethics in the polis. Moral hazard is identified as a threat to modern argument communities
Historically, dialectics is the general method of (early) philosophy. The philosophy rhetoric contro...
What role does reason play in our lives? What role should it play? And are claims to rationality lib...
The burgeoning science of ethics has produced a trend toward pessimism. Ordinary moral thought and a...
From early modernity, philosophers have engaged in skeptical discussions concerning knowledge of the...
From early modernity, philosophers have engaged in skeptical discussions concerning knowledge of the...
The psychology of reasoning and argumentation studies how people reason and persuade others using la...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing,...
By synthesizing the argumentation theory of new rhetoric with research on heuristics and motivated r...
Normative theories of argumentation tend to assume that logical and dialectical rules suffice to ens...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing...
The evidential value of moral intuitions has been challenged by psychological work showing that the ...
Abstract. Virtue theories have become influential in ethics and epistemol-ogy. This paper argues for...
Virtue ethics is perhaps the fastest growing field in ethical theory. Virtue theo-ries have also bee...
The outline of the paper is as follows: in Section 1, I first introduce what I hold to be the two ba...
Disagreements continue over the most basic epistemic questions. Which logic is correct? What makes a...
Historically, dialectics is the general method of (early) philosophy. The philosophy rhetoric contro...
What role does reason play in our lives? What role should it play? And are claims to rationality lib...
The burgeoning science of ethics has produced a trend toward pessimism. Ordinary moral thought and a...
From early modernity, philosophers have engaged in skeptical discussions concerning knowledge of the...
From early modernity, philosophers have engaged in skeptical discussions concerning knowledge of the...
The psychology of reasoning and argumentation studies how people reason and persuade others using la...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing,...
By synthesizing the argumentation theory of new rhetoric with research on heuristics and motivated r...
Normative theories of argumentation tend to assume that logical and dialectical rules suffice to ens...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing...
The evidential value of moral intuitions has been challenged by psychological work showing that the ...
Abstract. Virtue theories have become influential in ethics and epistemol-ogy. This paper argues for...
Virtue ethics is perhaps the fastest growing field in ethical theory. Virtue theo-ries have also bee...
The outline of the paper is as follows: in Section 1, I first introduce what I hold to be the two ba...
Disagreements continue over the most basic epistemic questions. Which logic is correct? What makes a...
Historically, dialectics is the general method of (early) philosophy. The philosophy rhetoric contro...
What role does reason play in our lives? What role should it play? And are claims to rationality lib...
The burgeoning science of ethics has produced a trend toward pessimism. Ordinary moral thought and a...