Add to ORKGIn this paper I develop and defend a form of argumentative normativity that is not based on fundamental principles. I first argue that research agendas that aim to discover (or claimed to have discovered) fundamental principles of ‘good’ argumentative discourse share one crucial weak spot, viz. circularity. I then argue that this weak spot can be avoided in a pancritical (Bartley, 1984) view of normativity
Normative naturalism is primarily a metaphysical doctrine: there are normative facts and properties,...
It has been argued that deationary theories of truth stumble over the normativity of truth. is paper...
Drawing on a rich pragmatist tradition, this book offers an account of the different kinds of ‘ought...
In this paper I develop and defend a form of argumentative normativity that is not based on fundamen...
In this paper I develop and defend a form of argumentative normativity that is not based on fundamen...
ABSTRACT: Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on...
Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on argumenta...
The paper considers the main arguments against the possibility that basic normative principles can c...
Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal a...
The thesis that the concept of a reason is the fundamental normative concept is in the air. In this ...
Sometimes pernicious circularities appear in definitions of fundamental concepts of argumentation th...
AbstractMorality, according to some theories, demands a lot of us. One way to defend such demanding ...
The thesis contains my early work arguing against evidentialism for reasons for belief (chapter 1), ...
This paper provides moderate criticism of so-called normative theories of thinking and reasoning. Th...
Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on argumenta...
Normative naturalism is primarily a metaphysical doctrine: there are normative facts and properties,...
It has been argued that deationary theories of truth stumble over the normativity of truth. is paper...
Drawing on a rich pragmatist tradition, this book offers an account of the different kinds of ‘ought...
In this paper I develop and defend a form of argumentative normativity that is not based on fundamen...
In this paper I develop and defend a form of argumentative normativity that is not based on fundamen...
ABSTRACT: Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on...
Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on argumenta...
The paper considers the main arguments against the possibility that basic normative principles can c...
Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal a...
The thesis that the concept of a reason is the fundamental normative concept is in the air. In this ...
Sometimes pernicious circularities appear in definitions of fundamental concepts of argumentation th...
AbstractMorality, according to some theories, demands a lot of us. One way to defend such demanding ...
The thesis contains my early work arguing against evidentialism for reasons for belief (chapter 1), ...
This paper provides moderate criticism of so-called normative theories of thinking and reasoning. Th...
Natural normativity describes the means whereby social and cultural controls are placed on argumenta...
Normative naturalism is primarily a metaphysical doctrine: there are normative facts and properties,...
It has been argued that deationary theories of truth stumble over the normativity of truth. is paper...
Drawing on a rich pragmatist tradition, this book offers an account of the different kinds of ‘ought...