<p>Performance comparison in terms of PR-curve on the Corel-1000 image collection.</p
<p>Comparison of the performance by different methods on IRMA benchmark dataset.</p
Comparison of the performance of the models using area under the curve (AUC) of ROC.</p
<p>MAP and avg. recall comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Corel-1500 image col...
<p>Performance comparison in terms of PR-curve on the Corel-1500 image collection.</p
<p>Performance comparison and statistical analysis of different sizes of the dictionary and features...
<p>Comparison of mean average precision using the Corel-2000 image benchmark.</p
<p>Performance measures comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Caltech-256 image c...
<p>Performance comparison among P2P,DCRLS and MobiCrowd with r = 100,200,300.</p
<p>Performance comparison of the best DCBS and TTB systems with the different feature sets.</p
<p>Comparison of performance for various features from whole, manually segmented, and automatically ...
<p>Performance comparisons of standalone SURF, standalone FREAK, and features fusion of SURF-FREAK t...
<p>The performance comparison between the proposed algorithm and Hum-mPLoc 2.0.</p
<p>Performance comparisons of standalone SURF, standalone FREAK, and features fusion of SURF and FRE...
<p>The performance of Abbott m2000 CT/NG system compared to the reference results.</p
<p>(a) Performance comparison between the sparse combined features (INRIA). (b) Performance comparis...
<p>Comparison of the performance by different methods on IRMA benchmark dataset.</p
Comparison of the performance of the models using area under the curve (AUC) of ROC.</p
<p>MAP and avg. recall comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Corel-1500 image col...
<p>Performance comparison in terms of PR-curve on the Corel-1500 image collection.</p
<p>Performance comparison and statistical analysis of different sizes of the dictionary and features...
<p>Comparison of mean average precision using the Corel-2000 image benchmark.</p
<p>Performance measures comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Caltech-256 image c...
<p>Performance comparison among P2P,DCRLS and MobiCrowd with r = 100,200,300.</p
<p>Performance comparison of the best DCBS and TTB systems with the different feature sets.</p
<p>Comparison of performance for various features from whole, manually segmented, and automatically ...
<p>Performance comparisons of standalone SURF, standalone FREAK, and features fusion of SURF-FREAK t...
<p>The performance comparison between the proposed algorithm and Hum-mPLoc 2.0.</p
<p>Performance comparisons of standalone SURF, standalone FREAK, and features fusion of SURF and FRE...
<p>The performance of Abbott m2000 CT/NG system compared to the reference results.</p
<p>(a) Performance comparison between the sparse combined features (INRIA). (b) Performance comparis...
<p>Comparison of the performance by different methods on IRMA benchmark dataset.</p
Comparison of the performance of the models using area under the curve (AUC) of ROC.</p
<p>MAP and avg. recall comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Corel-1500 image col...
DOI
Add to ORKG